
 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Nov. 6, 2003
/ 11 Mar-Cheshvan, 5764
Lies (and the lazy dunces who put them on Page One)
By
Andrew Silow-Carroll
A respected editor comes clean about his profession and the "news process"
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
When I was working for the Forward I got a call from
a staffer at the Committee for Accuracy in Middle
East Reporting in America, the pro-Israel media
monitor, complaining about a headline that appeared
in the paper. I forget now what the headline said, but
she began by telling me it was biased, slanted,
inaccurate, politically
unbalanced
I cut her off. "You're right," I
said. "It was late, I typed a
bad headline, no one caught
it, and we regret it. We
messed up." I don't think I said "messed."
There was stunned silence on the other end of the
phone, no doubt because she was used to
journalists defending their product to the bitter end,
bristling at charges of bias, and slamming the phone
down in contempt. I bypassed the broyges (perturbance) by
fessing up to a simple truth: Newspapers often make
mistakes that have nothing to do with the political
slants or personal agendas of the journalists who
work there.
This may be hard to believe, with the best-seller list
dominated by such works as Lies (and the Lying
Liars Who Tell Them) by the liberal Al Franken and
Who's Looking Out For You? by the conservative
Bill O'Reilly, both attacks on the authors'
adversaries in the media. And no doubt reporters
and editors often reveal their political and
ideological prejudices through selective reporting,
loaded language, and the none-too-subtle placement
of photographs and page-one articles.
But I've worked at enough newspapers to know that
readers too often assume bias when there are often a
host of other, more prosaic factors at work. Before
you accuse a newspaper of bias, try to control for
these four things: ignorance, logistics, storyline, and
storytelling.
Ignorance. I've fielded calls from local leaders who
were incensed that we left information out of an
article about their institution, or that we wrote one of
those unfortunate headlines, and assumed it could
only be that we hated them and their work. It's
flattering, in some ways, to be considered so
competent that the possibility that we didn't know
any better is not taken into consideration. The truth
is, we try to get the facts, but nothing exposes a
knowledge gap like tight deadlines and packed
schedules.
Logistics. A reader of the paper I edit, the New Jersey Jewish News, recently asked why a
Washington story he considered important was
deemed worthy only of a brief article on page 36,
rather than more extensive treatment closer to the
front of the newspaper. He could only assume that
we downplayed the story because we didn't share
the protagonist's politics. The truth was the story
broke late on a Tuesday afternoon, shortly before
we went to press and many hours after we had
selected which earlier stories went where. I'm still
not convinced the story was worth more extensive
treatment. But even had I wanted to "front" it, our
usual Washington correspondent was on vacation,
and the wire service on which we depend to
supplement our coverage of the capital sent us only
a three-paragraph article on the topic.
At this point, I'm tempted to write "and then the dog
ate the article"; but my point is that there are plenty
of reasons, not excuses, for the decisions we reach.
Take the often controversial decision about which
articles make it to the front page. At a weekly tabloid
like ours, only two, perhaps three, articles get that
treatment in a given week. We have a strong
preference for local news, under the assumption that
there are plenty of other outlets covering the big
national and international stories. Non-local stories
get extra points if they include a local or state figure,
such as a politician or communal leader. We could
run a front-page article on Israel or anti-Semitism
every week, but we try not to; we think it important
to vary the diet. A good illustration is important, and
we've sometimes "fronted" uninspired stories that
are accompanied by great photographs.
Storyline. In the most recent issue of The New
Republic, Jonathan Chait writes about media bias:
"Once the news media has settled on a perception of
a political figure, it becomes nearly impossible to
dislodge." That's true of many, if not all, news
phenomena: Lazy or time-pressed writers fit the facts
of a story into one of a number of preconceived
templates. One of my favorite examples was in The
New York Times' coverage of the tensions at
Rutgers between pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian
groups. On Oct. 11, Maria Newman wrote, "Rutgers
has become embroiled during the last few months in
a fierce debate about politics in the Middle East.
And at times the debate has degenerated into
incidents of incivility." Those two sentences imply
that both sides of the debate carried out "incidents
of incivility," when, in fact, the reporter would be
hard-pressed to find a single example of an Israel
supporter misbehaving (it was a Palestinian
supporter who tossed a pie at Natan Sharansky, and
the Hillel House that suffered a graffiti attack).
According to the reporter's storyline, each side in
the Middle East conflict, or a campus tussle, must be
equally to blame. In this case "balance" perverted
the truth.
Storytelling. Finally, journalists love a good story
and, let's be honest, so do readers. And the
temptation is to tell a tale from an unusual angle. I'm
guessing that's why, of the two main stories in the
Times on the Rutgers conference, one profiled
Charlotte Kates, the woman who organized the
pro-Palestinian conference, and the other led off
with Abe Greenhouse, the Jewish student who
tossed the pie at Sharansky. The editors guessed,
correctly, that we'd be fascinated by a profile of a
young woman who joined the Communist Party at
age 13 and still reveres Lenin. And Greenhouse is a
classic example of "man bites dog" the Jewish kid
who joins the Palestinian cause (that's why NJJN
also wrote about him). The Times may or may not
have it in for Israel, but in this case, I'm guessing
they merely wanted to entertain.
Of course, controlling for ignorance, logistics,
storyline, and storytelling does not mean you won't
find evidence of bias. Nor does it absolve editors of
the responsibility of rooting out bias, overt or
subconscious. But if editors agree really agree
to examine their own prejudices, then readers should
be willing to understand the pressures and
constraints under which journalists' work.
"Journalists aren't biased, just incompetent" (or
"lazy" or "overworked") is not exactly a rallying cry,
but readers and reporters should remember that it
sometimes fits.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading."
Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Andrew Silow-Carroll is Editor-in-Chief of New Jersey Jewish News.
Send your comments to him by clicking here.
© 2003, New Jersey Jewish News
|