|
|
|
Jewish World Review Oct. 26, 2012/ 10 Mar-Cheshvan, 5773 High court must settle affirmative action By Dan K. Thomasson
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | The U.S. Supreme Court is wrestling once again with the question of racial preference in college admissions. It is entirely possible that it might end the controversial policy of affirmative action, given the conservative bent of five of the nine justices. There's an old story about a brilliant football prospect at the University of Texas whose racial considerations were being challenged by a white student denied admission four years earlier. As the story goes, a young black man showed up at the university's stadium in Austin and asked for a tryout. The coach told the equipment manager to outfit him with old, oversized pads, helmet and clothing. The coach then told the ambitious athlete to start on the one-yard line and run through the entire team, which was lined up down the field to stop him. If he could do this, he was told, he would make the team. The young man took the ball and headed downfield with speed and grace that left the coach and his assistants breathless. When he reached the end zone 99 yards away, he turned around and ran back, outrunning and sidestepping tackle after tackle until he reached the coach and quietly handed him the ball. At that point, the coach turned to his equipment manager and fairly shouted. "For crying out loud, can't you get this Cuban kid something that fits?" The story, of course, is apocryphal at an institution that has promoted a policy to overcome those times when it was, like other Southern schools, a bastion of segregation. Through decades of effort, this highly endowed jewel of a public institution has managed to diversify its student body -- despite an earlier Supreme Court decision declaring that quota systems and other preferential devices in admissions based solely on race violate the Constitution. However, the court ruled that considering race in judging applicants to support campus diversity was acceptable. It is this concept that is being challenged by Katie Fisher, a white female student who went on to Louisiana State University and is about to graduate. She and her supporters contend that Texas, her first choice, unfairly denied her acceptance because of her skin color. It is time for the court to settle this contentious debate once and for all. Without a definitive ruling, the nation's public institutions will be under siege when it comes to their selection processes for the foreseeable future. For too long, many of the nation's most elite schools have created a false diversity that is more aimed at making them look good than in considering the welfare of those they contend benefit from it. One justice who opposes the policy is Clarence Thomas, who has benefited from it. He has said he found the affirmative action label a stigma. In a perfect world, intellect and skill would be the only qualities used to judge admission. Selecting one student over another would be based totally on academic merit combined with special talents. Only in tie situations would anything else come into play. The way to achieve diversity would be to improve the quality of secondary education for minorities. But as we all know this isn't a perfect world. So if two students come down to the wire, with both meeting the required test and skill levels, should race be a factor to settle the matter? The thorny question has caused major heartburn among academics for years. As the court already has said, giving racial preference points for being white, black, green or orange to reach a specific number violates the Constitution. Fisher, the complaining applicant, was a good student in high school. Why is she continuing her crusade four years later? She says she doesn't believe there should even be a race box on a college application. Her point is well taken. We will see if the court agrees.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here. Comment by clicking here.
• 10/16/12: Report confirms SATs flawed indicator • 08/20/12: All the news fit to tweet? • 07/27/12: Economic disillusionment marks young voters' views • 07/20/12: Will Postal Service follow Pony Express route? • 07/13/12: Paterno's statue should be covered up • 07/10/12: 8.2 jobless rate endangers Obama's job • 07/03/12: It's still the economy, stupid • 06/19/12: Mitt Romney's chances look better • 06/08/12: Pakistan not an ally worthy of the name • 06/05/12: Americans have a right to be bloated • 06/01/12: Quota system would dilute school's quality • 05/27/12: Even now, Memorial Day means summer camp • 05/18/12: Is there a public right to know too much? • 05/09/12: American exceptionalism --- exceptional generosity • 05/04/12: The Edwards trial is a sorry affair • 05/02/12: Common sense needs to be taught . . . to school administrators • 04/30/12: We must deal with college student debt rate • 04/10/12: At least Ryan has a deficit-cutting plan • 04/05/12: Celebrate one-year rent-a-teams? • 03/12/12: A kinder, gentler day when fists settled disputes • 03/05/12: Do conservatives want a victory or a statement? • 02/27/12: Hillary vs. Jeb? • 02/17/12: Why wait for the until GOP nominating convention? • 02/17/12: Prez is not a god, just a cause of O.G. D.: Obama Governmental Dysfunction • 02/13/12: Minor tardiness doesn't warrant court action • 02/08/12: College rankings aren't always reliable • 02/01/12: Millionaire Fans Watching Millionaire Players • 01/30/12: Kiriakou case may plug leaks, stifle democracy • 01/09/12: Feds need to find if Brit hackers targeted 9/11 families • 12/23/11: NIH flu-strain decision endangers us all • 12/09/11: U.S. Postal Service may be beyond saving • 11/30/11: Do-gooder gets deserved earful • 11/24/11: Lawmakers should pledge to think on their own • 11/22/11: Iowa: Vital to GOP now, irrelevant later • 11/16/11: Pentagon's ‘senior mentor’ service takes hit • 11/14/11: With Congress, expect more intransigence • 11/08/11: Paterno's illustrious career faces tarnished end • 10/31/11: The FBI is burned by its Boston informants • 10/18//11: President Inexperienced again picked style and enthusiasm over caution. He must pay • 10/10/11: Prosecutors routinely abuse plea bargaining • 10/04/11: In Christie,shades of William Howard Taft • 09/27/11: One word for Obama's prospects --- ‘bleak’ • 09/26/11: Obama quickly running out of time • 09/23/11: Big-time college football is now all about the money • 09/22/11: A trip to the dentist cleans out your wallet • 09/06/11: College rankings a useless exercise • 08/31/11: Thankful a mother isn't alive to see this hungry mess • 08/30/11: ‘Supercommittee’ should meet in secret • 08/22/11: Is college still worth it? Some majors are • 08/15/11: Pray for miracle from debt committee • 08/09/11: S&P mixes credit ratings with politics • 08/08/11: Politics again takes precedence over common sense • 08/04/11: In modern society, a distinct pattern of senselessness • 07/29/11: A debt solution: Throw the rascals out, all of them • 07/21/11: Campaign finance reform --- you're kidding, right!? • 07/08/11: Casey Anthony jury did its job • 07/05/11: Nailing a prominent figure or institution should come at a heavy risk — and an even greater price if proven a hoax
© 2011, SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE |
Arnold Ahlert | |||||||||||||
