 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Oct. 25, 2004
/ 10 Mar-Cheshvan, 5765
In praise of inertia
By
Jonathan Tobin
Despite election hysteria, remember the real American revolution of 1800
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
With about a week to go before the Nov. 2 presidential election, the
one thought that seems to unite many Republicans and Democrats is relief at the
prospect that this nasty contest will soon be over.
The 2004 election will surely go down in history as one of the most bitterly
fought in our country's history.
I'm enough of a student of history to know that other elections have been
dirty. For example, the matchup in 1800 between Federalist John Adams, and his
once and future friend — Republican Thomas Jefferson — was pretty awful; it
featured false accusations that Adams was a monarchist, and smears that Jefferson
had fathered children by one of his slaves. (Two centuries later, we've
discovered that accusation was probably true.)
But of all the presidential races of my adult life, this one appears to be
the most divisive, with the most apocalyptic rhetoric from both major parties.
Why has this happened?
Maniacal extremes
On the one hand, most Democrats think the last election was stolen from them,
and that the winner has launched an illegitimate war in the depths of the
Middle East. On the other, many Republicans have come to view the all-out
demonization of the president by the anti-war left as libelous, if not disloyal,
during wartime as America struggles against Islamist foes.
These issues have poisoned the debate in a way that has reduced many
otherwise sane and sober citizens to ranting nincompoops prepared to wildly accuse
their opponents of everything from treason to grand larceny.
Democrats talk of President Bush as an idiot or a war-mongering tool of
corporate interests who is about to turn America into a right-wing religious
dictatorship.
Republicans speak of Sen. John Kerry as a leftist appeaser who would sell out
U.S. security to a corrupt United Nations.
Those campaigning in the Jewish community have taken the debate over support
for Israel and church-state separation to similar extremes.
Some Democrats claim Bush will sell out Israel in his second term, and that
Jewish rights will vanish in a Philip Roth-like right-wing religious
dictatorship. At the same time, some Republicans claim Kerry will sell out Israel in his
first term in order to curry favor with the anti-Semitic French.
It's gotten so crazy that in reading the volumes of orchestrated e-mail from
radical supporters of both sides, you can often forget that there are serious
choices to be made on Nov. 2.
For example, on Israel, Kerry's election will probably mean Washington will
revert to the policies carried out in the Clinton administration to try and
push through a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, while Bush
will probably maintain the hands-off approach that has given Israel a green
light to pursue its own vision of disengagement.
Bush and Kerry also have different ideas about whether or not faith-based
charities would be funded by the government, as well as on other church-state
issues.
The republic will survive
But for all of this, it may be worthwhile to take into consideration the fact
that no matter who wins on Nov. 2, the republic as we know it will survive.
Even if Kerry tries to imitate Clinton in the Middle East, the prospect of
seeing Yasser Arafat returning to his familiar stamping grounds in the White
House are virtually nil. A President Kerry may have sour relations with Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, but he will be hard-pressed to rehabilitate the
Palestinians. And despite his Europhile tendencies, a looming conflict with Iran
may ultimately leave Kerry as disillusioned with his erstwhile pals in Paris,
as Bush has been.
On Israel, Bush is no more likely to sell out Israel in his second term than
he was in his first, which was won without much Jewish support. His
convictions on this issue seem firm. And despite the alarmist talk coming from
Democrats, four years of Republican control of the White House and Congress have not
led to the repeal of the Bill of Rights — or even led to progress for Bush's
faith-based charity initiative.
The point is, the genius of the American constitution is the inertia it
creates. The obstacles our system of checks and balances places in the way of
radical change are frustrating at times, but in tandem with the basic moderation of
the American electorate, they also serve as roadblocks to extremism.
Which brings me back to Adams and Jefferson. The 1800 election bore little
resemblance to anything remotely like a modern American election. Few direct
votes for president were cast anywhere and after all, African-Americans and women
couldn't vote, and in most states, neither could men who didn't own
property. But it deserves to be remembered for reasons that have nothing to do with
Sally Hemmings or Adams' predilection for suppressing dissent.
The test of democracy
Why? Because, the spirit of '76 notwithstanding, 1800 was the real American
revolution. That's because it was the first time in American history that a
peaceful handover of political power was accomplished.
When Jefferson won, the incumbent Federalists left Washington. They did
appoint as many judges as they could in their waning days of power. But when his
term ended, John and Abigail Adams packed up their duds and their accumulated
grievances, and went home to Massachusetts.
Those who have followed the course of democracy elsewhere in the world know
this is no small thing. Though they have been independent almost as long as
their counterparts in North America, most of the republics of Latin and South
America are still finding it difficult to maintain democracy. And throughout
Africa and Asia in the postcolonialist period, the rule has generally been one
man, one vote, one time.
So, when the results are hopefully finalized in the wee hours of Nov. 3, it's
important that we honor the outcome, even if we're sore about it. Attempts to
delegitimize the results in advance through wild and premature charges of
fraud do nothing to preserve our freedom. Nor do we advance the cause of
democracy when partisans feel free to say anything and everything about their foes in
the last weeks of campaigning just because they can.
No election victory is worth compromising the integrity of the American
system. That is the lesson of John Adams, who, disgruntled though he was, simply
handed over the reins of power and gracefully accepted his foe's triumph.
That is a lesson this year's loser should emulate, whether his name is Bush
or Kerry. It is even more important that their supporters prepare to do the
same.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2004, Jonathan Tobin
|
