![]()
|
|
Jewish World Review Sept. 13, 2005 / 9 Elul, 5765 A perspective on disaster By Robert Robb
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
With the Katrina floodwaters beginning to recede, perhaps there's room for
critical thinking about some difficult issues:
But the lachrymose reality is that, regardless of how good the preparation,
the initial response to a disaster that wipes out an entire major American
city is likely to be inadequate to the circumstances and the needs. It's in
the nature of the event.
What needed to be consolidated were the core functions involved in
detecting and disrupting a terrorist attack. These functions, however,
remain scattered throughout the federal government, principally in the CIA,
FBI and the Defense Department.
Instead, the Department of Homeland Security consolidated functions
peripheral to preventing a terrorist attack, combining agencies whose
primary responsibilities are elsewhere, such as the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
Some of us warned at the time that the proposed Department of Homeland
Security was creating more bureaucracy without any likely gain in security.
Yet Congress nearly unanimously approved it, and the administration wasn't
willing to take the political heat of resisting it.
Now the consolidation is being partially blamed for FEMA's sluggish
response to Katrina.
In creating the Department of Homeland Security, Congress ignored a
fundamental rule of governmental organization: If a more nimble and
flexible capability is the objective, don't build a bigger bureaucracy.
Certainly Congress is breezing right by it. "Money is not going to be the
question," House Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis has said.
With respect to helping those who have been displaced by Katrina, that's
perhaps an understandable and even admirable attitude. With respect to
rebuilding New Orleans, however, it's irresponsible.
The government has a responsibility to people, not to buildings or
particular geographical locations. The federal government should assume
responsibility for giving the evacuees a new start and cleaning up
Katrina's damage to remove any health hazards.
But the extent to which, and how, New Orleans is rebuilt shouldn't be a
federal decision. It should be the result of decisions made by state and
local governments and private actions and investments.
It would be far more effective, and probably less expensive in the long
run, to give evacuees at least a few months of living expenses, and let
them begin to get their lives together on their own initiative. The $2,000
debit cards being issued is a step in the right direction, but grossly
inadequate to the task.
Responding to a disaster of Katrina proportions requires the resources of
the federal government. But investing in prevention should be a state and
local responsibility.
There's been a lot of back-and-forth about whether the Army Corps of
Engineers was building strong enough levees quickly enough. But building a
levee system to protect New Orleans shouldn't be a federal responsibility.
By taking various measures to mitigate local risk through construction
programs, flood insurance, homeland security subventions, even high-rise
terrorism insurance the federal government actually increases risky
behavior and reduces the incentive for local governments to take protective
action on their own.
Although well-intentioned, these federal programs make catastrophes, when
they occur, larger than they otherwise would be.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Robert Robb is a columnist for The Arizona Republic. Comment by clicking here.
© 2005, The Arizona Republic |
Mitch Albom | |||||||||