|
|
Jewish World Review Sept. 29, 2003 / 3 Tishrei, 5764
Pentagon Jihadis
By Daniel Pipes
![]() | |
It has been obvious for months that Islamists who despise the United States have penetrated American prisons, law enforcement, and armed forces.
A milestone Wall Street Journal article in February 2003 established that imams who consider Osama bin Laden “a hero of Allah” dominate the Islamic chaplaincy in the New York State prison system.
I documented in March 2003 the case of FBI Special Agent Gamal Abdel-Hafiz, an immigrant whose pattern of pro-Islamist behavior was overlooked and instead he was promoted.
And at least six prior cases of Islamist servicemen have come to light:
The Akbar incident prompted Deanne Stillman of Slate magazine to conclude that Islamists "may be infiltrating the military in order to undermine it."
That infiltration also has a mundane quality, as shown by the example of Nabil Elibiary. He's an Islamist who protests the "defaming" of bin Laden and defends polygamy and who also led the holiday prayer service at an air force base in early 2003. The executive branch's insistence on "terrorism" being the enemy, rather than militant Islam, permits this Islamist penetration.
And it continues. The Defense Department responded last week to the chaplain's arrest by defending its hiring practices. Only under external pressure, notably from senators Chuck Schumer and Jon Kyl, did it agree to reassess them. Even then, the Pentagon insisted on reviewing the appointments of all 2,800 military chaplains rather than the 12 Muslims among them.
Political correctness run amok! Which Christian or Jewish chaplains would be accused, as was their Muslim colleague last week, The Washington Times reports, of "sedition, aiding the enemy, spying, espionage and failure to obey a general order"? By pretending not to see that the enemy emerges from one source, the authorities dilute their focus and render their review nearly meaningless and endangering security.
The U.S. government needs to use common sense and focus on militant Islam. It should consider such steps as:
Ironically, the Defense Department finds it easier to kill Islamists in Afghanistan than to exclude them from its own ranks. But only if the latter is carried out can Americans be confident their government is fully protecting them.