Nov. 6, 2009 Rabbi Berel Wein: Choosing to hear JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes) Caroline B. Glick The mullahs' big week Suzanne Fields A Fallen Wall for Fallen Man Nov. 5, 2009 The Kosher Gourmet: Three scrumptious -- but simple -- butternut squash dishes JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes) Nov. 4, 2009 Tom Hamburger and Kim Geiger: Should prayers be covered? JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes) Nov. 3, 2009 Martin Peretz: Beware, Barack. Beware, Rahm. Beware, Axelrod JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater? With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes) Nov. 2, 2009 Paul Greenberg: The Holocaust is now on Facebook JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes) Oct. 30, 2009 Rabbi David Aaron: Secret to Immortality Caroline B. Glick Silencing dissent in America Oct. 29, 2009 Lini S. Kadaba: Do tactics avert flu or reduce humanity? JWisdom.com We Must Revamp our Religious Vocabulary With Gavriel Aryeh Sanders ( 10 minutes) Oct. 28, 2009 Rabbi Yonason Goldson: Atheists in Bubbleland JWisdom.com Why what we wear impacts who we are With Rabbis Mordechai Becher, Menachem Golberger and Aliza Bulow ( 10 minutes) Oct. 27, 2009 Paul Greenberg: The United Nations Is Outraged Again, Or: Department of Mideast Static JWisdom.com The Science of Love With Rabbi Jonathan Rietti ( 7 minutes) Oct. 26, 2009 The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Damaging disclosures with a twist JWisdom.com Wisdom and Wonks With Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes) Oct. 23, 2009 Rabbi David Aaron: Are you ready for the ultimate pleasure? JWisdom.com Watermark and oneness with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 4 minutes) Caroline B. Glick Stop using limited powers in a way that expands our enemies' advantages over us Oct. 22, 2009 Steven Emerson: Terror Cases Share Desire to Kill Americans JWisdom.com No More More Family Fights --- Really? By Sarah Chana Radcliffe ( 5 minutes) Oct. 21, 2009 Tonya Alanez: Holocaust denier sues survivor, calling Auschwitz memoir 'vicious lies' JWisdom.com Meditating Jewishly: A Panacea for Success by Sarah Yoheved Rigler ( 7 minutes) Oct. 20, 2009 Dennis Prager: Obama and Dalai Lama: Why Israel Worries about U.S. President JWisdom.com Abraham was not religious By Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer ( 6 minutes) Oct. 19, 2009 The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Q. Is nepotism kosher? JWisdom.comWhy Good People Do Bad Things By Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes) Oct. 16, 2009 Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The Perfect Number JWisdom.com Hearing Voices By Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 5 minutes) Caroline B. Glick How Turkey was lost Oct. 15, 2009 Jeff Jacoby: Peace vs. the 'peace process' JWisdom.com: Former MTV producer and stand-up comedian Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff: Taming a Control Freak (A VERY fast 15 minutes) Oct. 29, 2003 Mortimer B. Zuckerman: Graffiti On History's Walls (MUST-READ!)

Jewish World Review August 3, 2006 / 9 Menachem-Av, 5766 Why is there no workable philosophy of music? By Paul Johnson http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Why, exactly, do we find Beethoven's last quartets so moving and powerful? What are the mental and neurological processes which produce those spine-tingling reactions to Wagner's Ring? No answer to these questions. It is significant but not surprising that Charles Darwin, in investigating the evolution of humanity, had almost nothing to say about music, and Freud, in explaining our psyche, even less. The most remarkable thing about musical sounds is the abyss that separates them from verbal sounds, an abyss bridged not by understanding but by antagonism. There is no generally agreed philosophy of music. Well, you may say, there is no consensual philosophy of anything. Maybe; but we can philosophise easily about painting (vide Ruskin or Pater, passim) and to plunge into a philosophy of literature we have only to read a page or two of Coleridge's Biographia Literaria to get started. But music being, at its best and purest, abstract does not, perversely enough, lend itself to philosophical abstraction because of the verbal barrier. Discussing this point, Oliver Wendell Holmes, the doctor-pundit, laid down in Elsie Venner (1861), the best of his 'medicated novels' combining biology and fiction: 'By music we reach those special states of consciousness which, by being without form, cannot be shaped by the mosaics of the vocabulary.' But that does not get us very far. All the attempts to describe the ability of music to move us (so much more powerfully than painting) begin and usually end in negatives. I have looked through the 20 volumes of my copy of Grove's Dictionary of Music without finding any entry on musical philosophy or kindred topics. The big Oxford English Dictionary has over five dense columns on music but its head-definition is feeble: 'That one of the fine arts which is concerned with the combination of sounds with a view to beauty of form and expression of emotion.' Actually Gower in 1390 did rather better. 'The Science of Musique,' he wrote, 'that techeth upon Armonie A man to make melodie' - an analysis that at least gives food for thought. Music can be described only by metaphor even in its elementals. Take 'pitch', for example. The big new Grove definition is hopeless: 'The peculiar quality of a sound (e.g., an individual musical note) that fixes its position in the scale.' The old five-volume Grove does much better, bringing in the concept of 'the scale of acuteness and gravity', its position being determined by 'the number of double vibrations per second which produces that sound'. The terms 'high' and 'low' are metaphors, even more so than acuteness and gravity. To be accurate, it says, we should define pitch by vibration-number. The need to use metaphors all the time in describing music, and their limitations and deceptions, explains why the philosophy of music has been so slow to develop and remains unsatisfactory. Edward Hanslick - the great 19th-century German music critic who was the first to try to set down a systematic philosophy of music - denied the expressionist view that music (like painting) is a language of the emotions, but when he put forward an alternative argument it was strangled in metaphor: a translation by G. Payzant, published by the University of Indianapolis in 1986 as On the Beautiful in Music, is available. The opposite point of view - that music is a, indeed the, language of the emotions - was put half a century ago by Deryck Cooke in The Language of Music (1959), in which he uses musical phrases, tonalities and chordal progressions as translations of particular emotional states. Which composers would agree with that approach? Wagner certainly, for his leitmotif system is the kind of interpretive glossary Cooke wrote about. And it is no wonder that Hanslick was fundamentally opposed to everything Wagner tried to do. But Beethoven would have been hostile, for though he was quite capable of writing emotional programme music, as in his Pastoral Symphony, at his most serious, as in Opus 131 and Opus 133, he moves strictly in the realm of an abstraction so absolute that words are helpless to describe it. It is interesting that Stravinsky, another who was capable of writing to programme, and whose Rite of Spring is musical visualisation as well as emotional expression, denied that music was the designation of anything whatever. These points, and other theories, have been much discussed recently, and you can follow the arguments in such periodicals as the Musical Times and Music and Letters. Last year Jennifer Robinson put the emotional case in Deeper than Reason: Emotion and its Role in Literature, Music and Art (OUP). Aaron Ridley, in The Philosophy of Music (Edinburgh 2004), is closer to Stravinsky, in so far as I understand him. And a scientific approach by Steven Mithen, who is not primarily a musicologist or a philosopher, is provided by The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body (Weidenfeld 2005). This too puts the emotional case, since he provides a contrasting definition of language, a 'communication system specialising in the transmission of information', and music, 'a communication system specialising in the expression of emotion'. I hate the purely emotional explanation because it makes, for instance, some of the best of Bach meaningless. On the other hand, if you discount it you are driven, as Hanslick was, to a dynamic approach, in which music gets (abstractly) better and better, just as between the 13th and 16th centuries painting became closer and closer to perfect representation, and then was forced to take refuge in the emotionalism of mannerism and the baroque. Hanslick dismissed virtually all music before the 17th century as barbarous, and said he would rather see all Palestrina's works destroyed than one major piece by Mendelssohn. He also asserted that all the concertos and sonatas of Bach were unquestionably less valuable than the quartets of Schumann and Brahms. Once you begin to make relative evaluations of first-class musical works you run into the central problem of musical philosophy: the inability to find words to convey meritorious meaning. It might be helpful if physiologists would devote more attention to the parts of the brain which deal with musical sounds (as opposed to purely verbal ones). I learn from Mithen that brain damage need not impair musical consciousness. I believe that those suffering from Alzheimer's who are unable any longer to read or even to speak can still, apparently, enjoy music. Someone who was once very close to me but who is now what used to be called senile can still, I know, appreciate art. I paint her pictures of birds which she will hold in her hands, and peruse again and again for hours with evident pleasure. Her hearing is still acute. She once sang in the Oxford Bach Choir. Music is still getting through to her, I think, though she cannot confirm this. Attempts to devise musical philosophy have hitherto begun with the music and progressed to human beings. Perhaps we should reverse the process and start with the brain. Does it matter, anyway? Can a true philosophy of music actually increase our enjoyment of a Beethoven quartet? No. But it might help me, for instance, either to get the point of Schoenberg, or conscientiously to drop him for good as worthless. Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here. BUY THE BOOK Click HERE to purchase it at a discount. (Sales help fund JWR.). Eminent British historian and author Paul Johnson's latest book is "American Presidents Eminent Lives Boxed Set: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant". Comment by clicking here. Previously: 07/11/06: Historically speaking, energy crisis is America's opportunity 07/06/06: The misleading dimensions of persons and lives 06/06/06: First editions are not gold 05/23/06: A downright ugly man need never despair of attracting women, even pretty ones 04/25/06: Was Washington right about political parties? 04/12/06: Let's Have More Babies! 04/05/06: For the love of trains 03/29/06: Lincoln and the Compensation Culture 03/22/06: Bottle-beauties and the globalised blond beast 03/15/06: Europe's utopian hangover 03/08/06: Kindly write on only one side of the paper 02/28/06: Creators versus critics 02/21/06: The Rhino Principle © 2006, Paul Johnson

Arnold Ahlert  Mitch Albom  Michael Barone   Dave Barry  Tony Blankley  Andy Borowitz  David Broder  Stratfor Briefing  Mona Charen  Linda Chavez  Ann Coulter  Greg Crosby  Larry Elder  Suzanne Fields  John Fund  Frank J. Gaffney  Lloyd Garver  Jonah Goldberg  Julia Gorin  Jonathan Gurwitz  Paul Greenberg  Lewis Grossberger  Victor Davis Hanson  Betsy Hart  Nat Hentoff  David Horowitz  Laura Ingraham  Cheri Jacobus Jeff Jacoby  Paul Johnson  Jack Kelly  Ed Koch  Ch. Krauthammer  Michael Ledeen  John Leo  David Limbaugh  Kathryn Lopez  Rich Lowry  Michelle Malkin  Jackie Mason  Dick Morris  Bill O'Reilly  Jim Mullen  Clarence Page  Kathleen Parker  Dennis Prager  Wesley Pruden  Tom Purcell  Jonathan Rauch  Celia Rivenbark  Robert Robb  Cokie & Steve Roberts  Pat Sajak  Debra J. Saunders  Culture Shlock  Roger Simon  Michael Smerconish  Thomas Sowell  Mark Steyn  John Stossel  Cal Thomas  Bob Tyrrell  Diana West  Dave Weinbaum  George Will  Walter Williams  Byron York  Mort Zuckerman  Robert Arial  Chuck Asay  Baloo  Chip Bok  Dry Bones   Lisa Benson  John Branch  Gary Brookins  John Cole  J. D. Crowe  John Deering  Brian Duffy  Everything's Relative  Mallard Fillmore  Jake Fuller  Bob Gorrel  Joe Heller  David Hitch  Jerry Holber  Steve Kelley  Jeff Koterba  Dick Locher  Chan Lowe  Ranan R. Lurie  Jimmy Margulies  Rick McKee  Michael Ramirez  Kevin Siers  Jeff Stahler  Ed Stein  Danna Summers  John Trever  Gary Varvel  Kirk Walters  How 2  Lori Borgman  The Savvy Consumer  Elder matters  Fixit  Dr. Peter Gott  GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko  Richard Lederer  Tech Maven  Every Monday Matters  Nutrition Myths  Bookmark These  Bruce Williams  How Stuff Works