
 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
July 22, 2009
/ 1 Menachem-Av 5769
Beware of comprehensive health care reform
By
Tony Blankley
| 
|
|
|
| |
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
I was listening to National Public Radio's morning "news" Monday
on the way to work, during which the newsperson read the apparently
"factual" statement that the United States is the only developed country
that does not provide "comprehensive" health care coverage.
Perhaps only those of us who are highly trained ideological
vigilantes would leap to attention on the use of the word comprehensive. To
most people, the word comprehensive sounds good. Of course, those who
opposed "comprehensive immigration reform" a few seasons ago might have
started twitching on hearing the word applied to health care reform.
Comprehensive, as the dictionary defines it, means "including
all or everything." It is very similar in meaning to the definition of
total, which the dictionary defines as "complete, thorough." If something
includes everything, it is complete.
Of course, it is not surprising that NPR uses the White House
talking-point word "comprehensive" rather than its synonym "total," because
total health care coverage easily might sound like totalitarian health care
coverage. And by the way, the dictionary defines totalitarian as "having and
exercising complete political power and control." Note that pesky word
complete a synonym for comprehensive in the definition of
totalitarian.
And of course, the word "reform" (as in the phrase
"comprehensive health care reform"), which is defined as "to improve by
alteration, correction of error or removal of defects; put in better form"
is itself subjective and assumes several facts not in evidence most
pointedly that a reform will "improve" or "correct" an "error" or "defect."
The foregoing is not intended as merely overdrawn semantics.
Words convey concepts, which shape public thoughts, which lead to public
support for legislation, which may change the way we live our lives and
meet our deaths.
So to provide comprehensive health care reform suggests that
defects and errors in our current limited health care system would be
improved and corrected with complete health care services for all. What
could be wrong with having new, improved and complete stuff for all? After
all, for generations we have heard on television similar words: "Improved
Tiger Flakes provide complete calcium and vitamin needs for your children's
health."
But sometimes, partially hidden meanings in persuasive-sounding
words may be unwelcome truths that advocates don't want the public to think
about.
Because, when you think about it, it also could be said of
America that we do not have a "comprehensive food-provision system" or a
"comprehensive clothing-provision system" or a "comprehensive housing
system" or a "comprehensive economic-planning system" or a "comprehensive
job-providing system."
In fact, of course, those comprehensive systems are only
available in countries that comprehensively control human lives and actions.
How else can the government assure "complete" things if it doesn't control
things "completely" or "totally"?
We have seen many examples in this sad world of what the
citizens get when their governments provide comprehensive or total goods and
services. Freedom of action or inaction is possessed "comprehensively"
by the government, while whatever the government gives the public
"comprehends" the total that the public gets of a good or service. As
between two parties, something comprehensively possessed by one is, by
definition, completely not possessed by the other.
The current health care proposal is a ripe example. In a recent
op-ed defending the administration's health care proposal, Sen. Ted Kennedy
and Bob Shrum argued: "We also need to move from a system that rewards
doctors for the sheer volume of tests and treatments they prescribe to one
that rewards quality and positive outcomes. For example, in Medicare today,
18 percent of patients discharged from a hospital are readmitted within 30
days at a cost of more than $15 billion in 2005. Most of these
readmissions are unnecessary, but we don't reward hospitals and doctors for
preventing them. By changing that, we'll save billions of dollars while
improving the quality of care for patients."
But as Bill Kristol in The Weekly Standard brilliantly pointed
out about the idea that the readmissions aren't needed and that we don't
reward the prevention of them: "The most important implication of the
Kennedy-Shrum claim ... is this: The government is going to decide ahead
of time, obviously, since deciding after the fact wouldn't save any money;
and based on certain general criteria, since the government isn't going to
review each individual case what kinds of hospital readmissions for the
elderly are 'unnecessary' and what kinds aren't. And it's going to set up a
system 'to reward hospitals and doctors for preventing' the unnecessary
ones. That is, the government will reward hospitals and doctors for denying
care they now provide, care the government will now deem 'unnecessary.'"
Of course, we have the advantage that the Kennedy-Shrum article
was published for all to read. The actual legislation doubtlessly will not
be available for review before it is voted on.
All we can know for sure is that the Democrats' comprehensive
health care reform legislation will empower bureaucrats comprehensively to
make all decisions, vital and trivial, regarding your health care
coverage or non-coverage. The comprehensive power of the federal
government will completely and totally extinguish your control over your
health treatment.
The price of freedom is that you will not be taken care of
comprehensively. The price of being taken care of comprehensively is that
you won't be free. You pays your price and you takes your choice. Down with
Comprehensiveness! Up the Revolution!
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Archives
Tony Blankley is executive vice president of Edelman public relations in Washington. Comment by clicking here.
© 2009, Creators Syndicate
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Tony Blankley
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Alan Douglas
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
Marybeth Hicks
David Horowitz
Jeff Jacoby
Renee James
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Ben Wattenberg
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

Mr. Know-It-All
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
Tech Maven
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|