Nov. 6, 2009 Rabbi Berel Wein: Choosing to hear JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes) Caroline B. Glick The mullahs' big week Suzanne Fields A Fallen Wall for Fallen Man Nov. 5, 2009 The Kosher Gourmet: Three scrumptious -- but simple -- butternut squash dishes JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes) Nov. 4, 2009 Tom Hamburger and Kim Geiger: Should prayers be covered? JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes) Nov. 3, 2009 Martin Peretz: Beware, Barack. Beware, Rahm. Beware, Axelrod JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater? With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes) Nov. 2, 2009 Paul Greenberg: The Holocaust is now on Facebook JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes) Oct. 30, 2009 Rabbi David Aaron: Secret to Immortality Caroline B. Glick Silencing dissent in America Oct. 29, 2009 Lini S. Kadaba: Do tactics avert flu or reduce humanity? JWisdom.com We Must Revamp our Religious Vocabulary With Gavriel Aryeh Sanders ( 10 minutes) Oct. 28, 2009 Rabbi Yonason Goldson: Atheists in Bubbleland JWisdom.com Why what we wear impacts who we are With Rabbis Mordechai Becher, Menachem Golberger and Aliza Bulow ( 10 minutes) Oct. 27, 2009 Paul Greenberg: The United Nations Is Outraged Again, Or: Department of Mideast Static JWisdom.com The Science of Love With Rabbi Jonathan Rietti ( 7 minutes) Oct. 26, 2009 The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Damaging disclosures with a twist JWisdom.com Wisdom and Wonks With Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes) Oct. 23, 2009 Rabbi David Aaron: Are you ready for the ultimate pleasure? JWisdom.com Watermark and oneness with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 4 minutes) Caroline B. Glick Stop using limited powers in a way that expands our enemies' advantages over us Oct. 22, 2009 Steven Emerson: Terror Cases Share Desire to Kill Americans JWisdom.com No More More Family Fights --- Really? By Sarah Chana Radcliffe ( 5 minutes) Oct. 21, 2009 Tonya Alanez: Holocaust denier sues survivor, calling Auschwitz memoir 'vicious lies' JWisdom.com Meditating Jewishly: A Panacea for Success by Sarah Yoheved Rigler ( 7 minutes) Oct. 20, 2009 Dennis Prager: Obama and Dalai Lama: Why Israel Worries about U.S. President JWisdom.com Abraham was not religious By Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer ( 6 minutes) Oct. 19, 2009 The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Q. Is nepotism kosher? JWisdom.comWhy Good People Do Bad Things By Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes) Oct. 16, 2009 Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The Perfect Number JWisdom.com Hearing Voices By Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 5 minutes) Caroline B. Glick How Turkey was lost Oct. 15, 2009 Jeff Jacoby: Peace vs. the 'peace process' JWisdom.com: Former MTV producer and stand-up comedian Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff: Taming a Control Freak (A VERY fast 15 minutes) Oct. 29, 2003 Mortimer B. Zuckerman: Graffiti On History's Walls (MUST-READ!)

Jewish World Review July 6, 2006 / 10 Tamuz, 5766 The misleading dimensions of persons and lives By Paul Johnson http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | I am disquietingly conscious of feeling smaller than I was; relatively, that is. For most of my life, being six foot one, I have loomed over the majority of men and almost all women. Now, at the local Sainsbury's, where queues are constant as they are too mean to employ enough staff, I find I am often out-topped by young fellow-queuers, sometimes even by girls. Many of the young men are enormous, six-and-a-half, even seven feet. Female six-footers stride along the pavements, elbowing elderly dwarves out of the way. When I was a young man living in Paris, one of my girlfriends was a six-footer, an American called Euphemia, whom the goggling French thought a gratte-ciel. But that was most unusual. My French girls tended to be around five foot two or three. Quite enough, as tall French females, in my experience, tend to be exceptionally tiresome. So, paradoxically, do English girls of five foot or less. Dorothy Wordsworth was an exception, being one of the most angelic figures in our literary history, until she got Alzheimer's in the 1840s. She said she was five foot. She was delighted to meet the tiny Thomas de Quincy, just under four foot ten, because 'he is the first person who has made me feel tall'. What I want to know is this. Is the increase in average height, which is clearly a fact, being accompanied by an increase in intelligence? If so, it is a historic reversal. In the diaries of Edmund Wilson, which I have been reading, there is a passage on this point. Stephen Spender, a tall man, complains to him that for physiological reasons, relative intelligence declines with height. He said he had been lamenting this correlation with Aldous Huxley, who was a lanky giant and who argued that it was impossible for someone of his physique to have an absolutely first-class brain. Wilson, who was short and stout, heard this with some complacency and cited another example: Ernest Hemingway, a tall man whose cerebration somehow did not come up to scratch. Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Kant were all pretty short, were they not? But not all beanpoles concur. Old Galbraith, the economist, who died the other day in his late nineties, often boasted of his 'towering intelligence', as though it could be measured in feet and inches. He was certainly exceptionally tall. At the funeral of Jack Kennedy in Washington, General de Gaulle, six foot eight, I think, who took a keen interest in men as tall as himself (though he liked small women), spotted him and demanded: 'Present that homme élevé to me.' You could not exactly say that de Gaulle was short on intelligence, though he certainly lacked other things — generosity, gratitude, tolerance, magnanimity, etc. He was in the wrong profession until he transformed himself into a politician, since almost all successful generals have been below average height. There are, of course, exceptions — Washington being one. I wish some meticulous scholar would produce a book giving the heights (and other personal details, such as hair colour) of important historical figures. Recently, one of those know-all correspondents in The Spectator challenged my assertion (taken from the DNB) that Mary Queen of Scots was five foot ten, and insisted that both she, and her mother Mary of Guise, were both exactly six foot. How can anyone be so sure? Take the case of Nelson. He was smallish. But how small exactly? Enormous trouble has been taken by generations of biographers, from Southey onwards, to get a precise figure. His effigy in Westminster Abbey, confidently asserted at the time to be lifesize, is five foot five inches. 'Nelson's Spot', a height measurement in the old Admiralty Board Room, is five foot four. Some of Nelson's uniforms, and many other articles of clothing, have survived, and calculations based on them give estimates varying from five foot four to five foot six. But some contemporary guesses put it at below five foot four. There has been a lot of argument, too, over the exact height of Napoleon and Wellington, both small men. Monty was small, too, and so was Harding, best of our postwar generals. Ike was not particularly small: when I met him at Nato HQ I'd say he was 'average'. But then he was not much of a general. How tall was Patton? Photos make him look big. Above all, what was the height of Rommel? We ought to know such things. Why, you ask? Sheer curiosity. And did not Dr Johnson rightly remark: 'Sir, there is no item of information, however insignificant, which I would not rather know, than not know.' Such a book, if conscientiously compiled so we could trust it, would tell us these minutiae, and would be widely bought and consulted. It should cover as many fields as possible. For instance, I have an impression that famous historians were small. This was formed at Oxford, where I saw Powicke, Gabriel le Bras, Neale, Braudel, Southern, etc. But Carlyle was an exception, not far short of six foot, and so was the shambling Lecky. But how tall was Maitland? Then again, writers. A lot were certainly small: Milton, Pope, Gray, Lamb, Hardy, Wells, Waugh being examples taken at random. But Thackeray was enormous, and Shaw pretty tall. Wilde was always a strong, hefty fellow even before he put on weight. Mention of Shaw raises another point I have been thinking about. Somewhere in the Letters of Sir Walter Raleigh, 1884-1922, the old critic and literary pundit remarks: 'We often talk about length of life, but the number of years a man lives can be misleading. We should also consider breadth of life.' That is true. Shaw lived to be 94, being born in 1856 and dying in 1950, an immensely long life by the standards of a century ago. But his life lacked breadth: there were whole areas of the emotions and the senses into which he never ventured, and he emerges from his huge volumes of correspondence, which I have on my shelves, as narrow and bony, like his body. He lived so long, I suspect, because only part of him was actually alive. Of course it has to be said that shortness of life does not guarantee breadth: far from it. For instance, Dylan Thomas's life was short, but the fat volume of his letters gives an impression of its narrowness, an existence focused on distressingly few, almost entirely sensual, objects, dominated by the need to get money by writing endless begging letters. Keats, by contrast, died very young but his letters have an overarching span of impressive width, and all his activities under the span were intense, whirling, potent and driven by strong emotion, right up to the last weary collapse. On the other hand again, Shelley's life, certainly lacking length, did not exactly lack breadth, but there was something missing: an ability to feel personal affection or emotion beyond a certain point where it ceased to have the abstract or idealistic or theoretical aspects which interested him. In short, he lacked depth. I notice comparable contrasts between pairs of contemporaries in the arts. Turner said of Girtin, wiped out by TB, 'If Tom had lived, I should have starved.' Untrue, of course. But Turner's life, totally intense in his work (no artist was ever so wholly absorbed in his profession) lacked breadth at a personal level. And poor Géricault's life, tragically short, was rich in breadth, whereas Delacroix, who lived so long, never advanced beyond the point at which Géricault's death left him. There is much food for argument here. Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here. BUY THE BOOK Click HERE to purchase it at a discount. (Sales help fund JWR.). Eminent British historian and author Paul Johnson's latest book is "American Presidents Eminent Lives Boxed Set: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant". Comment by clicking here. Previously: 06/06/06: First editions are not gold 05/23/06: A downright ugly man need never despair of attracting women, even pretty ones 04/25/06: Was Washington right about political parties? 04/12/06: Let's Have More Babies! 04/05/06: For the love of trains 03/29/06: Lincoln and the Compensation Culture 03/22/06: Bottle-beauties and the globalised blond beast 03/15/06: Europe's utopian hangover 03/08/06: Kindly write on only one side of the paper 02/28/06: Creators versus critics 02/21/06: The Rhino Principle © 2006, Paul Johnson

Arnold Ahlert  Mitch Albom  Michael Barone   Dave Barry  Tony Blankley  Andy Borowitz  David Broder  Stratfor Briefing  Mona Charen  Linda Chavez  Ann Coulter  Greg Crosby  Larry Elder  Suzanne Fields  John Fund  Frank J. Gaffney  Lloyd Garver  Jonah Goldberg  Julia Gorin  Jonathan Gurwitz  Paul Greenberg  Lewis Grossberger  Victor Davis Hanson  Betsy Hart  Nat Hentoff  David Horowitz  Laura Ingraham  Cheri Jacobus Jeff Jacoby  Paul Johnson  Jack Kelly  Ed Koch  Ch. Krauthammer  Michael Ledeen  John Leo  David Limbaugh  Kathryn Lopez  Rich Lowry  Michelle Malkin  Jackie Mason  Dick Morris  Bill O'Reilly  Jim Mullen  Clarence Page  Kathleen Parker  Dennis Prager  Wesley Pruden  Tom Purcell  Jonathan Rauch  Celia Rivenbark  Robert Robb  Cokie & Steve Roberts  Pat Sajak  Debra J. Saunders  Culture Shlock  Roger Simon  Michael Smerconish  Thomas Sowell  Mark Steyn  John Stossel  Cal Thomas  Bob Tyrrell  Diana West  Dave Weinbaum  George Will  Walter Williams  Byron York  Mort Zuckerman  Robert Arial  Chuck Asay  Baloo  Chip Bok  Dry Bones   Lisa Benson  John Branch  Gary Brookins  John Cole  J. D. Crowe  John Deering  Brian Duffy  Everything's Relative  Mallard Fillmore  Jake Fuller  Bob Gorrel  Joe Heller  David Hitch  Jerry Holber  Steve Kelley  Jeff Koterba  Dick Locher  Chan Lowe  Ranan R. Lurie  Jimmy Margulies  Rick McKee  Michael Ramirez  Kevin Siers  Jeff Stahler  Ed Stein  Danna Summers  John Trever  Gary Varvel  Kirk Walters  How 2  Lori Borgman  The Savvy Consumer  Elder matters  Fixit  Dr. Peter Gott  GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko  Richard Lederer  Tech Maven  Every Monday Matters  Nutrition Myths  Bookmark These  Bruce Williams  How Stuff Works