
 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
July 6, 2006
/ 10 Tamuz, 5766
The misleading dimensions of persons and lives
By
Paul Johnson
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
I am disquietingly conscious of feeling smaller than I was; relatively, that is. For most of my life,
being six foot one, I have loomed over the majority of men and almost all women. Now, at the local
Sainsbury's, where queues are constant as they are too mean to employ enough staff, I find I am
often out-topped by young fellow-queuers, sometimes even by girls. Many of the young men are
enormous, six-and-a-half, even seven feet. Female six-footers stride along the pavements, elbowing
elderly dwarves out of the way.
When I was a young man living in Paris, one of my girlfriends was a
six-footer, an American called Euphemia, whom the goggling French thought a gratte-ciel. But that
was most unusual. My French girls tended to be around five foot two or three. Quite enough, as tall
French females, in my experience, tend to be exceptionally tiresome. So, paradoxically, do English
girls of five foot or less. Dorothy Wordsworth was an exception, being one of the most angelic
figures in our literary history, until she got Alzheimer's in the 1840s. She said she was five foot. She
was delighted to meet the tiny Thomas de Quincy, just under four foot ten, because 'he is the first
person who has made me feel tall'.
What I want to know is this. Is the increase in average height, which is clearly a fact, being
accompanied by an increase in intelligence? If so, it is a historic reversal. In the diaries of Edmund
Wilson, which I have been reading, there is a passage on this point. Stephen Spender, a tall man,
complains to him that for physiological reasons, relative intelligence declines with height. He said he
had been lamenting this correlation with Aldous Huxley, who was a lanky giant and who argued that
it was impossible for someone of his physique to have an absolutely first-class brain. Wilson, who
was short and stout, heard this with some complacency and cited another example: Ernest
Hemingway, a tall man whose cerebration somehow did not come up to scratch. Plato, Aristotle,
Aquinas, Kant were all pretty short, were they not? But not all beanpoles concur. Old Galbraith, the
economist, who died the other day in his late nineties, often boasted of his 'towering intelligence', as
though it could be measured in feet and inches. He was certainly exceptionally tall. At the funeral of
Jack Kennedy in Washington, General de Gaulle, six foot eight, I think, who took a keen interest in
men as tall as himself (though he liked small women), spotted him and demanded: 'Present that
homme élevé to me.' You could not exactly say that de Gaulle was short on intelligence, though he
certainly lacked other things generosity, gratitude, tolerance, magnanimity, etc. He was in the
wrong profession until he transformed himself into a politician, since almost all successful generals
have been below average height. There are, of course, exceptions Washington being one.
I wish some meticulous scholar would produce a book giving the heights (and other personal details,
such as hair colour) of important historical figures. Recently, one of those know-all correspondents
in The Spectator challenged my assertion (taken from the DNB) that Mary Queen of Scots was five
foot ten, and insisted that both she, and her mother Mary of Guise, were both exactly six foot. How
can anyone be so sure? Take the case of Nelson. He was smallish. But how small exactly?
Enormous trouble has been taken by generations of biographers, from Southey onwards, to get a
precise figure. His effigy in Westminster Abbey, confidently asserted at the time to be lifesize, is five
foot five inches. 'Nelson's Spot', a height measurement in the old Admiralty Board Room, is five
foot four. Some of Nelson's uniforms, and many other articles of clothing, have survived, and
calculations based on them give estimates varying from five foot four to five foot six. But some
contemporary guesses put it at below five foot four. There has been a lot of argument, too, over the
exact height of Napoleon and Wellington, both small men. Monty was small, too, and so was
Harding, best of our postwar generals. Ike was not particularly small: when I met him at Nato HQ
I'd say he was 'average'. But then he was not much of a general. How tall was Patton? Photos make
him look big. Above all, what was the height of Rommel? We ought to know such things.
Why, you ask? Sheer curiosity. And did not Dr Johnson rightly remark: 'Sir, there is no item of
information, however insignificant, which I would not rather know, than not know.' Such a book, if
conscientiously compiled so we could trust it, would tell us these minutiae, and would be widely
bought and consulted. It should cover as many fields as possible. For instance, I have an impression
that famous historians were small. This was formed at Oxford, where I saw Powicke, Gabriel le
Bras, Neale, Braudel, Southern, etc. But Carlyle was an exception, not far short of six foot, and so
was the shambling Lecky. But how tall was Maitland? Then again, writers. A lot were certainly
small: Milton, Pope, Gray, Lamb, Hardy, Wells, Waugh being examples taken at random. But
Thackeray was enormous, and Shaw pretty tall. Wilde was always a strong, hefty fellow even
before he put on weight.
Mention of Shaw raises another point I have been thinking about. Somewhere in the Letters of Sir
Walter Raleigh, 1884-1922, the old critic and literary pundit remarks: 'We often talk about length
of life, but the number of years a man lives can be misleading. We should also consider breadth of
life.' That is true. Shaw lived to be 94, being born in 1856 and dying in 1950, an immensely long life
by the standards of a century ago. But his life lacked breadth: there were whole areas of the
emotions and the senses into which he never ventured, and he emerges from his huge volumes of
correspondence, which I have on my shelves, as narrow and bony, like his body. He lived so long, I
suspect, because only part of him was actually alive.
Of course it has to be said that shortness of life does not guarantee breadth: far from it. For
instance, Dylan Thomas's life was short, but the fat volume of his letters gives an impression of its
narrowness, an existence focused on distressingly few, almost entirely sensual, objects, dominated
by the need to get money by writing endless begging letters. Keats, by contrast, died very young but
his letters have an overarching span of impressive width, and all his activities under the span were
intense, whirling, potent and driven by strong emotion, right up to the last weary collapse. On the
other hand again, Shelley's life, certainly lacking length, did not exactly lack breadth, but there was
something missing: an ability to feel personal affection or emotion beyond a certain point where it
ceased to have the abstract or idealistic or theoretical aspects which interested him. In short, he
lacked depth.
I notice comparable contrasts between pairs of contemporaries in the arts. Turner said of Girtin,
wiped out by TB, 'If Tom had lived, I should have starved.' Untrue, of course. But Turner's life,
totally intense in his work (no artist was ever so wholly absorbed in his profession) lacked breadth
at a personal level. And poor Géricault's life, tragically short, was rich in breadth, whereas
Delacroix, who lived so long, never advanced beyond the point at which Géricault's death left him.
There is much food for argument here.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
| BUY THE BOOK |
|
Click HERE to purchase it at a discount. (Sales help fund JWR.). |
|
Eminent British historian and author Paul Johnson's latest book is "American Presidents Eminent Lives Boxed Set: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant". Comment by clicking here.
Previously:
06/06/06: First editions are not gold
05/23/06: A downright ugly man need never despair of attracting women, even pretty
ones
04/25/06: Was Washington right about political parties?
04/12/06: Let's Have More Babies!
04/05/06: For the love of trains
03/29/06: Lincoln and the Compensation Culture
03/22/06: Bottle-beauties and the globalised blond beast
03/15/06: Europe's utopian hangover
03/08/06: Kindly write on only one side of the paper
02/28/06: Creators versus critics
02/21/06: The Rhino Principle
© 2006, Paul Johnson
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Tony Blankley
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Alan Douglas
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
Marybeth Hicks
David Horowitz
Jeff Jacoby
Renee James
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Ben Wattenberg
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

Mr. Know-It-All
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
Tech Maven
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|