
 |
|
Nov. 20, 2009
Nov. 19, 2009
Jonathan Tobin: ADL Crosses the Line with Report Bashing Obama Critics
Nov. 18, 2009
JWisdom.com: The (Jewish) Dating Game
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (8 minutes)
Nov. 17, 2009
Steven Emerson: How Does the 4th Amendment Impact Terror Finance Investigations?
JWisdom.com: If Frank Sinatra married Edith Piaf
with Rabbi Y.Y. Rubinstein (2 minutes) Life lessons from what would be regarded as the most inappropriate lyrics ever sung
Nov. 16, 2009
JWisdom.com: Deconstructing faith
with Rabbi Warren Goldstein (9 minutes)
Nov. 13, 2009
JWisdom.com Sarah's subjective reality
with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 6 minutes)
Nov. 12, 2009
JWisdom.com Does God get tired?
with Rabbi Harvey Belovski ( 5 minutes)
Nov. 11, 2009
JWisdom.com Marriages are not made in Heaven
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (VERY fast 15 minutes)
Nov. 10, 2009
Michael Doyle: Author of book exposing CAIR ordered to remove supporting documents from Web
JWisdom.com If the creation so loudly shouts the existence of the Creator, why aren't more people believers? with Rabbi Naftali Brawer (9 minutes)
Nov. 9, 2009
Mark Steyn: Shooter exposes hole
in U.S. terror strategy
JWisdom.com It's never too late to
have a happy childhood with Sarah Chana Radcliffe (5 minutes)
Nov. 6, 2009
JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How
to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes)
Nov. 5, 2009
JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking
Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes)
Nov. 4, 2009
JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker
With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes)
Nov. 3, 2009
JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater?
With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes)
Nov. 2, 2009
JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change
With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes)
|
| |
Jewish World Review
July 26, 2005
/ 19 Tammuz, 5765
Terrorists caught on camera
By
Rich Lowry
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
The four would-be suicide bombers of the botched July 21 attacks
in London have a big problem. They were caught on videotape. Their
images have been broadcast in Britain and around the world, making
their apprehension astronomically more likely than if they had
escaped undetected.
For this, we have security cameras to thank. London has half a
million of them. According to one estimate, a person wandering
around London will be filmed 300 times in a day. The city is a
pioneer of a trend toward video surveillance that is also sweeping
the United States and provoking howls from civil libertarians whose
internal clocks are set to make a reference to "1984" every 15
minutes or so. Given the choice, apparently, they would prefer not
to have the video of the July 21 bombers, which is an indication of
the suicidal otherworldliness of ACLU-style civil libertarianism.
Opponents of video cameras unroll various arguments about the
cameras. They complain that the cameras are intrusive and a
violation of privacy. But how is it possible to violate someone's
privacy in a park or a subway car? People have a right to privacy
only where they have an expectation of privacy, and that is not in
public places where things they do are susceptible to viewing by
dozens of pairs of eyes. No one should expect pristine privacy while
walking in a subway tunnel, let alone while he is running away after
having attempted to kill and maim people.
If they can't brandish the Fourth Amendment, civil libertarians
get down to practical policing and claim that cameras don't really
do anything to prevent crime; they only occasionally help solve
crime after the fact. Even if this were true, solving one terror
attack alone and therefore perhaps unraveling networks that would
attack in the future makes the cameras worth it.
Cameras won't deter suicide bombers what will? but they
can tamp down other criminal activity. Cameras in Britain are
credited with discouraging the IRA bombing campaign in the 1990s. On
a less serious front, San Francisco one of many jurisdictions,
including New York, Houston and New Jersey, that have cameras in
their train systems saw vandalism drastically decline on subway
cars after the installation of surveillance cameras.
Some cities have turned to cameras in high-crime areas, mounting
them to watch activities in parks and on dangerous streets. The Los
Angeles Times reported in October 2004, "Earlier this year, police
began monitoring seven cameras around MacArthur Park in the city's
Westlake district, watching in amazement as crime plummeted, gangs,
drug dealers and pimps disappeared, and families with children began
returning to the 40-acre expanse in one of the city's poorest
areas." Chicago has used cameras to make drug busts in real time.
Then there is the last resort of civil libertarians. When no
real harm can be demonstrated, they always discern a subtle
"chilling effect." "When citizens are being watched by the
authorities," says Barry Steinhardt of the American Civil Liberties
Union, "they are more self-conscious and less freewheeling." But
urban areas, where the cameras are proliferating, are not notably
bastions of inhibited behavior. The City Journal's Heather Mac
Donald, who is nation's foremost critic of the excesses of the ACLU,
writes, "The only people whom public cameras inhibit are criminals;
they liberate the law-abiding public." When they move a camera out
of a troubled neighborhood, Chicago police now get complaints from
neighbors, who want pimps and drug dealers to be decidedly
inhibited.
The priority of a certain class of civil libertarians is
apparently to protect Americans from nonexistent threats to their
liberty at the expense of protecting them from real threats to their
safety. The New York Civil Liberties Union is considering a federal
lawsuit over New York's new policy of randomly searching the
backpacks of subway passengers. Only if terrorists can get on
mass-transit systems without any risk of their bags being searched
or their images being recorded will they finally rest easy.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment by clicking here.
Rich Lowry Archives
© 2005 King Features Syndicate
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Michael Barone
Dave Barry
Tony Blankley
Andy Borowitz
David Broder
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
John Fund
Frank J. Gaffney
Lloyd Garver
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Lewis Grossberger
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Laura Ingraham
Cheri Jacobus Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Dick Morris
Bill O'Reilly
Jim Mullen
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Jonathan Rauch
Celia Rivenbark
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Culture Shlock
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
Gary Brookins
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holber
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Ranan R. Lurie
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

How 2
Lori Borgman
The Savvy Consumer
Elder matters
Fixit
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Tech Maven
Every Monday Matters
Nutrition Myths
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
How Stuff Works
|