As an investment professional it pains me to write this: In the world of mutual fund investing, you don't always get what you pay for. Often, you don't even know how much you are paying.
When it comes to clothes, meals, hotels, cars and many other products and services, we are accustomed to paying more for higher quality. Unfortunately, that rule of thumb does not apply to investments.
All mutual funds charge fees. There's nothing wrong with that. Managers need to get paid, and the funds incur costs as part of conducting business.
However, some funds are more expensive than others. When new clients come to our firm, they generally own funds with high expense ratios. When I point this out, they sometimes ask if they are paying a higher fee for better performance. Sadly, that is often not the case.
Small increases in fund expense ratios can add up to big dollar differences in your returns over time. For example, let's look at two funds: a $10,000 investment in a fund with a 2% expense ratio compared with the same $10,000 investment in a fund with a 0.5% expense ratio. If both have gains of 10% in a year, the fund with the higher expense would net $10,800 vs. $10,950 for the fund with lower expenses. That difference compounds over time.
It's easy to find fund expense ratios on sites like Morningstar or Yahoo Finance. Here is an overview of some of the fees that funds might charge:
This goes to the fund's portfolio manager. As of this writing, Superfund Managed Futures Strategy A (SUPRX) has one of the highest management fees in the fund universe at 3.28% according to the fund's prospectus. LoCorr Dynamic Equity A (LEQAX) had fund expenses at 3.21% as stated in its prospectus. Fund companies can raise or lower the stated expense ratios from year to year, however, they tend to hover around the amounts stated in the prospectus.
Typically, funds that are passively managed charge lower management fees. This is because they track a basket of stocks.
These fees are used to reward intermediaries for promoting a fund. In other words, it's a commission. Be aware: A fee-only registered investment adviser cannot receive one of these commissions and is not incentivized to sell these products to unwitting clients. An adviser who is not obligated to act as a fiduciary can sell you these products loaded up with extra fees.
In case you were wondering, higher 12b-1 fees do not improve performance. More on fees and performance later. These fees average around 0.13%, so if you purchase $10,000 of a mutual fund with 12b-1 fees, that translates to $13 per /year. This is a yearly charge which can be distributed to the broker who sold the fund.
To discourage trading, funds can charge a redemption fee to investors who sell shares. Redemption periods have a large range -- commonly 30 days to a year -- so be sure to understand if and how your fund assesses redemption fees before you buy (and especially before you sell). It's a percentage of the value of the funds but can be no more than 2% as mandated by the
A load is another sales charge that rewards an intermediary for distributing shares of a mutual fund. Loads can be front-end or back-end.
- Front-end loads are typically found in A-share classes. This sales charge occurs when the investor buys the fund, and it can be as high as 5.75% of the total investment! The money is typically passed on to the broker who sold you the fund.
- Back-end loads (aka deferred sales charges) are typically found in B-share classes. This charge occurs when the investor sells the fund and can be as high as 5%! The money goes to the broker selling the investment.
Always ask your adviser if you are paying one of these fees. Or, better yet, look it up yourself.
But wait, there's more.
Funds with high turnover rates incur a host of "hidden" costs that are less transparent to investors. The two primary hidden costs are transaction fees and tax inefficiencies. Combined, they are the worst offenders in running up fund expenses.
UC Davis professor
Mutual funds are notoriously inefficient when it comes to taxes. Say you bought a mutual fund that currently holds a stock trading at $100 a share. Then the stock drops to $80, and the fund decides to sell that position. You just lost $20 on that holding, which should generate a tax write-off. However, if the mutual fund originally acquired the stock at $50, the fund must pay taxes on those profits. As an investor in the fund, you must share in that tax liability. According to a study by Morningstar, the average cost of mutual fund tax inefficiency is approximately 1.10% per year.
But wait, there's STILL more.
Believe it or not, the higher the fees, the worse funds perform, according to another study by Morningstar. And that held true across asset classes. Intuitively it makes sense: The higher the fees, the bigger the hurdle the fund must overcome to outperform its competitors.
What about transaction costs and tax inefficiencies? A joint study in 2017 by
So, what should you do?
Just because some mutual funds charge exorbitant fees and underperform their benchmarks doesn't mean you should give up on mutual funds. Several fund families, such as
A quick and easy way to find information on expenses and hidden costs is the Morningstar website. When you search for a fund, you will see information about its expenses and turnover, in addition to basic data, such as its current price. The expense ratio is straightforward, combining the management fee, 12b-1 fees and other operating costs into one percentage for easy comparison.
More inquisitive investors can also look at turnover. As with expenses, a lower number is better. If the fund has 100% turnover, the fund replaces all its holdings over a 12-month period, which means higher transaction costs and taxes.
When choosing a fund, don't simply look at past performance. Once you are sure the fund's strategy aligns with your investment goals, risk tolerance, time horizon and overall asset mix, make sure you understand the fees being charged. Don't you want more of your hard-earned money staying with you, rather than lining a someone else's pockets?