 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
April 30, 2004
/ 9 Iyar, 5764
Too high a Wall
By
Jonathan Tobin
Supreme Court's ruling on the Pledge avoids a separationist meltdown
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
Anyone who believes that the rituals that begin school are meaningful ways to
instill patriotism is probably too old to actually remember going to school.
Indeed, most youngsters have trouble actually saying the words of the Pledge
of Allegiance correctly, and have little idea of what they mean.
Thus, all the carrying on about the content of the pledge recited each
morning by millions of schoolchildren is something of a theoretical exercise.
But it is one that could have a tremendous impact on the future of the
U.S. Constitution and American politics. That's why the stakes were high when
this week the U.S. Supreme Court overruled a lower court decision that said the
inclusion of the words "under G-d" in the pledge was unconstitutional.
In the case, Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, the court did what
it loves to do best: It punted. Rather than rule on the merits of the case, it
ruled, that Michael Newdow, the atheist who brought the suit on
behalf of his daughter, had no standing to sue the government. The child's
mother, a Christian, supports the pledge.
OUT ON A LIMB
The court decided this was more of a custody dispute than a constitutional
one, and so spiked the San Francisco-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th
Circuit that had agreed with Newdow.
The partisans of both sides of this case walked away without a decisive
victory. But the vast majority of Americans who support the separation of religion
and state, but do not want government to be a G-d-free zone, can breathe a
sigh of relief, at least for the moment.
The fact is, savvy liberals understood Newdow's suit was a case of
overreaching. Polls show that at least 90 percent of Americans support the inclusion of
G-d in the pledge, and the backlash from a ruling in Newdow's favor would have
almost certainly handed President Bush a cudgel with which he could have
bashed Democratic challenger Sen. John Kerry, in spite of the fact that Kerry
opposed Newdow's suit.
And though it is likely that a majority of the current court would have
probably ruled against Newdow on the merits had they chosen to do so, the fact that
they did not allows separationists to wait for a more propitious moment and a
more favorable court to try again.
Daniel Alter, director of civil-rights issues for the Anti-Defamation League,
which foolishly supported the pledge ban, told The New Republic that Newdow
was a "a good case at the wrong time." But given the innocuous nature of the
pledge, it is important to ask the ADL and others who weighed in against "under
G-d" whether the interests of the Jews, or any other group of Americans, was
really endangered by these two words or the symbolism they convey?
Newdow's suit was not completely out of left field. The 9th Circuit agreed
with his reasoning, seeing the 1992 case in which the Supreme Court ruled that a
rabbi's nonsectarian prayer at a high school graduation ceremony violated the
First Amendment as a binding precedent.
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor disagreed in her concurring opinion, overruling
the 9th Circuit when she said that "under G-d" was merely a permissible
"ceremonial Deism" rather than religious worship.
'G-D SAVE THIS COURT'
O'Connor wasn't the only one to note irony of an institution which begins
each of its sessions with the pronouncement declaring "G-d save the United
States and this honorable court," making an issue of the pledge. For all of the
talk about the "wall" between religion and state, its hard to point out any part
of the federal government in which G-d is a stranger. Both Houses of Congress
have chaplains, and G-d is on every coin and dollar bill in our pockets.
But Justice Clarence Thomas, in a separate opinion backing the pledge, may
have been closer to the truth than his colleagues when he concluded that Newdow
was right to claim that his suit followed court precedent. Thomas thought the
unwillingness of the Supremes to follow the logic of their previous decisions
on the pledge illustrates the questionable reasoning that has led us to the
point where the mere mention of G-d is controversial.
The First Amendment bans the "establishment" of a government religion.
Forcing children to recite sectarian prayers in school was just that, and the
Supreme Court was right to ban such prayers in its landmark 1962 decision.
This ruling remains unpopular with many, if not most, Americans, who don't
understand what it is to be a religious minority. But rather than be satisfied
with this step, radical secularists, including some Jews who regard any overlap
between religion and state as a threat, have continued to push the envelope
ever since.
They have often won, but does anyone really think the presence of clergy at
graduation ceremonies threatened anyone's rights?
Is it reasonable to assert that the Constitution must not only be neutral
between religions, as our founders intended, but aggressively anti-clerical?
Are we so scared of religion, that we would stigmatize it in this way?
As the pendulum has swung further and further in favor of separation, it is
religious believers who have rightly come to think of religious speech as the
one form of expression that our courts will no longer protect.
Rather than defending the rights of minorities, this philosophy has given
rise to a legal culture that views religious institutions with a suspicion that
is both unwarranted and itself oppressive. Courts have ruled that states have a
right to ban financial aid for religious studies alone. Giving parents the
financial tools to choose whether their children will attend a failing public
school, or a good religious school, has been steadfastly opposed in the name of
a flawed separationist theory.
Instead of pausing to reload before they try again, this should be a moment
for the radicals to rethink their strategy.
Religion has thrived on our shores precisely because we have kept government
and faith separate. But those who have made the leap from there to a position
in which the government is opposed to faith have misjudged both the American
people and the Constitution.
This entirely unnecessary, and in some ways farcical, debate over the pledge
should serve as a reminder of what happens when we allow extremists to
determine the public agenda. The court should think long and hard about letting them
do so again.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2004, WPWG
|
