 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
June 15, 2004
/ 26 Sivan, 5764
Jews for Bush?
By
Dick Polman
Prez could pick up sizeable Jewish vote — and if so, score a re-election, analysts observe
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
(KRT) A month after 4,500 fellow Jews went wild for President Bush in a Washington ballroom, Steve Rabinowitz still sounds peeved about the spectacle.
He didn't like the shouts of "four more years." He didn't like the 24 standing ovations. And, as a Democratic strategist, what he dislikes most is the widely shared belief that Bush could rack up a sizable Jewish vote in November — perhaps enough to swing a closely contested state such as Pennsylvania, Florida or Ohio.
"Every four years, my Republican friends say that this will be the election when the Jews go Republican, and, every time, the election results prove them wrong," he said the other day. "They're like the boy who cried wolf. It makes me crazy. You want to say, 'Little boy, there's no wolf!' Enough already!"
But this year, Rabinowitz and the Democrats could be wrong. And it's not just the Bush Republicans who are saying that.
Bush was feted in that Washington ballroom last month for his hawkish pro-Israel policies, and for his overthrow of the Iraqi dictator who had long represented a threat to Israel. For those reasons alone, many political observers insist that John Kerry and the Democrats should be worried about losing a hefty share of the Jewish vote.
Jews make up only 4 percent of the electorate, but they're heavily concentrated in big states where, in many cases, Bush and Kerry are deadlocked. And even though Jews, as predominantly liberal-leaning voters, tend to reject Republican candidates — Bush won only 19 percent of the Jewish vote last time — Bush's strategists know that if they can hike their share to 30 percent or more, it could spell the difference between victory and defeat in another photo-finish election.
"The Democrats should absolutely be concerned, and I have given that message to the Kerry people," said Jack Rosen, a Democrat and president of the nonpartisan American Jewish Congress. He said that Bush has shown "guts" and "backbone" in his staunch support for Israel — and that could resonate with Jewish voters who are primarily concerned about Israel's survival and the war on terrorism. Those voters may have become more numerous since Sept. 11, 2001.
ONLY NEEDS ENOUGH TO TIP SCALES
Most Jewish voters don't focus solely on Israel, but the GOP is focused on those who do. Ken Goldstein, a political analyst in Wisconsin who tracks the Jewish vote, said, "Bush doesn't necessarily need a huge movement of Jews. We're living in a political environment where small margins in only a few places can make a difference. This is about how Jews vote in Miami and Boca Raton, in the Cleveland suburbs, and in the Philadelphia suburbs."
Susan MacManus, a Florida political analyst and former state elections commissioner, predicted that Bush could garner far more than 30 percent of the state's Jewish voters in November, "and that's a concern to Democrats here right now. Any losses from their base would be terrible for them. The Jewish voters here are older (than the national average), and concern for Israel may be higher among older voters."
Bush is stressing those security concerns, declaring that the United States and Israel are joined in the fight against terrorists — while Democrats are essentially saying that Kerry would be just as tough abroad, but a lot better than Bush on the domestic staples that have always resonated with Jews (separation of church and state, social justice, individual rights).
And there's the dilemma. David Harris, who directs another nonpartisan group, the American Jewish Committee, said: "Many Jews are engaged in an internal tug of war. They want to applaud the President's response to global terrorism, but they still have their traditional domestic concerns. That's why there's such fierce competition right now between the parties."
One problem is that nobody has decent — as in recent — poll numbers. The last survey was released in January, when Harris' group found that 31 percent of Jews would vote for Bush — but that was back when Kerry was a blip in the polls and seemingly poised for a quick exit. Also, 35 percent of Jews voted for GOP candidates in the last round of congressional elections — but that was 19 months ago.
Independent [ and Arab - editor] pollster John Zogby does not have any numbers, but he believes that a 30 percent Jewish vote for Bush would be "a stretch." Why? Because the vast majority of Jews are too liberal (on issues such as same-sex marriage, for example) to embrace an ideologically conservative president, and too skeptical about Ariel Sharon's hard-line posture to make Israel a litmus test at the ballot box.
But what about the big Jewish audience that treated Bush like a rock star at the May event hosted by Washington's top pro-Israel lobbying group? Democratic strategist Rabinowitz said the reception did not really mean anything: "America's Jewish leadership just likes to suck up to power. If there are any single-issue Jewish voters, they were all in that room.
"Once Kerry reaches the threshold of reassuring people that he's good on Israel, then the conversation with Jewish voters pivots to domestic issues — which is where Kerry cleans Bush's clock."
The counter-spin comes from Matt Brooks, who has been talking up the prospects of GOP gains among Jews since he became director of the Republican Jewish Coalition in 1990. He said, "We're in a life-or-death situation, the same as Israel has been facing — every time we get on a plane, every time the alert status is raised. And that should remind us how important it is to pick a vital leader."
THE INTERNET FACTOR
And he's sending out e-mails that paint Kerry as a flip-flopper. It's a matter of record that, in 2003, Kerry condemned Israel's security fence as "a barrier to peace," only to reverse himself this year; and that after he angered Jewish leaders by declaring in a speech that he would consider ex-President Jimmy Carter as a Middle East envoy (some view Carter as pro-Arab), he renounced the idea and blamed it on his speechwriters.
"Those two incidents have had a long life span," said Harris, the Jewish leader, "because of the Internet. With Kerry, there's still a dating process going on."
Jewish Democrats concede that, in some cases, Bush has been bold; in April, he rejected the Palestinian refugee claim of a "right of return" to Israel, and that's a historic shift in U.S. policy. But they are telling the fence-sitters in their midst that Bush's record on Israel doesn't match the hype.
Sam Tenenbaum, a Jewish Democratic fund-raiser in South Carolina, cited the Bush family's long-standing ties to Saudi Arabia's ruling family: "Has Bush forced the Saudis to get tough with the schools run by Islamic extremists? The schools that are teaching the children to hate Jews? Bush hasn't dealt with that. I bring that up at every meeting I go to."
And maybe history will repeat itself. In 1996, Republicans talked up their Jewish vote by touting "opportunities for realignment" — and Bob Dole got 16 percent. In 1992, they promised "an incremental shift" — and the senior George Bush got 11 percent. If this race stays tight and seems poised to hinge on a few thousand votes in a big swing state, Rabinowitz and the Democrats will surely hope that the boy has cried wolf again.
.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment by clicking here.
© 2004, The Philadelphia Inquirer. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.
|
