May 20, 2013
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
May 19, 2010
/ 6 Sivan 5770
Only Roberts gets juvenile sentencing case right
In striking down a sentence of life without parole for a juvenile armed burglar, the U.S. Supreme Court demonstrated the problem when it does the right thing for the wrong reason.
The 8th Amendment to the Constitution forbids "cruel and unusual punishments." This particular sentence was unusual in a couple of respects.
In the first place, life without parole is an unusual sentence for armed burglary in Florida, the state in question, and anyplace else.
Moreover, the circumstances that gave rise to this sentence were highly unusual and arguably improper.
The juvenile, Terrence Graham, originally entered into a plea bargain for armed burglary. Adjudication was withheld and Graham was given three years probation with the first year in jail, with credit for time served.
Graham was subsequently alleged to have attempted another burglary, while still a juvenile. The life without parole sentence was imposed for the first offense after a finding that Graham violated his probation. Nevertheless, it is clear from the comments of the sentencing judge at the time, that the sentence was strongly influenced by the alleged additional burglary - to which Graham had never pled guilty nor been found guilty.
In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts looked at the circumstances in this particular case and concluded that Graham's punishment was, indeed, unconstitutionally unusual.
That, however, isn't the way the majority of the justices decided the case. Four justices joined an opinion by Anthony Kennedy that found that, for juveniles, all life sentences without parole constitute cruel and unusual punishment for any nonhomicide crime regardless of how heinous and depraved. Rather than decide Graham's case, they used Graham's case as an excuse to issue a categorical ban.
In doing so, the court relied on one of those judge-made rules with no grounding in the actual language of the Constitution. This one reads almost like a parody of the "living Constitution" theory law professors teach but no would-be judge admits to supporting during confirmation hearings.
Here's what the judge-made rule says. And to borrow from Dave Berry, I'm not making this up: Determining what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is based upon "the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society."
According to the majority opinion, the fact that 37 states and the federal government allow for some juveniles to be sentenced to life without parole in some circumstances isn't an indication of the prevailing "standards of decency." Instead, the fact only 12 jurisdictions have actually meted out such a sentence, and most of such sentences are in Florida, indicates a consensus against the practice.
The slippery and disingenuous nature of this reasoning is easily demonstrated. How many states does it take to preserve the constitutionality of a particular punishment? The court never says. And the evolution can only take place in one direction. After the court declares a particular punishment unconstitutional, any consensus moving in the opposite direction is forbidden.
Basically, the court is acting as a superlegislature, forbidding punishments that offend the sensibilities of a majority of the justices, using a manufactured "consensus" as a rationale, and then outlawing any movement or indication to the contrary.
Clarence Thomas' dissent in the case, joined by Antonin Scalia and in part by Samuel Alito, does his usual excellent job of making mincemeat of the ungrounded and slippery reasoning of the majority opinion. But he also takes issue with Roberts' take on the case as going beyond what the court has previously done in considering the unusualness of sentences in individual cases.
The 8th Amendment, however, is an individual right grounded in the Constitution's general promise of equal justice under law. Unless the Supreme Court is willing to take an independent look at sentences applied in individual cases, the protection against "unusual" punishments is meaningless.
Of nine justices, only one - Roberts - got the role of the court right. That's discouraging.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Robert Robb is a columnist for The Arizona Republic. Comment by clicking here.
Robert Robb Archives
© 2010, The Arizona Republic
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K