 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
May 30, 2007
/ 13 Sivan, 5767
The Heavy Burden of Victory
By
Jonathan Tobin
Lamenting the 'occupation' won't make the facts that led to '67 conflict go away
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
French writer Alexandre Dumas the elder wrote in 1854 that "nothing
succeeds like success." But when it comes to the State of Israel, it
appears that nothing seems to fail as abysmally as victory.
As the world notes the 40th anniversary of the Six-Day War this coming
week, much of the coverage and commentaries about the topic seem to
center on the same theme: How Israel's historic triumph has become an
intolerable burden that is itself the primary "obstacle" to peace.
Once upon a time, the great victory of 1967 that was achieved against
great odds and at a moment in history — when much of the world expected
that Israel was about to suffer a catastrophic defeat — was emblematic
of Jewish pride. Yet that event is now increasingly seen as emblematic
of unhappiness with the Jewish state.
40 YEARS OF … 'OPPRESSION'?
After all, the critics note, the anniversary's not so much of battles
fought and won against great odds, but of 40 years of Israeli
"oppression" of Arabs in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, the
territories "conquered" in 1967.
The toll exacted by Israel's presence in the territories is seen as
being responsible for the country losing its soul. Settlements and
checkpoints have become deeply negative symbols of the country. In the
Diaspora, it is the villainous Israel of "occupation" that has become
the pariah despised by intellectuals and academics, and increasingly
shunned by Jews who are not eager to identify with an oppressor.
Among those who do still embrace Israel, the war's anniversary inspires
nostalgia for the state that existed before the unification of
Jerusalem, and access to places where our history began to topple
the existing Israeli political applecart. It was, as the Israel Policy
Forum's M.J. Rosenberg, recently wrote, the Israel of the book and film
"Exodus," a place he asserts, that could be admired without apology.
The war set in motion a series of events that led inevitably not just
to settlements, but to the end of Labor Party domination of Israeli
politics and the mainstreaming of forces such as the nationalist right,
religious and Sephardi Jews, who had hitherto been marginalized by the
Ashkenazi elite.
The Israeli right has had its failures, but the idea that the country
was better off under the rule of the paternalistic Labor-dominated
government of Israel's pre-war era is more myth than fact. The
socialism embraced by that governing elite didn't merely retard the
nation's economic progress. An era in which the government prevented
the development of local television — to cite just one example of the
excesses of this time — is nothing about which we should wax nostalgic.
Yet Rosenberg is right when he says that a more powerful Israel than
the idealized early pioneer state "is a hard sell to those under 50,
and particularly to young Jews of college age." But the problem is that
those, like Rosenberg, whose main agenda is "to end the nightmare" of
the occupation, seem to forget what the alternative to the actual
outcome of the Six-Day-War was.
That is the crux of much of the teeth-gnashing about Israel's 40 years
of post-1967 sin. The main point of contention between Israel and the
Palestinians, and their supporters, is the same as it was 40 years ago:
the existence of a Jewish state within any borders.
What then was the alternative to victory and "occupation?"
The answer is simple. Had Israel been defeated, then the oft-repeated
threats of extermination of both the State and her people by Arab
leaders such as Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser and Palestinian
leader Ahmed Shukairy, might well have been fulfilled.
We are told, ad nauseum, that the "occupation" is the reason for the
ongoing conflict. Yet in 1967, Israel's dominion was limited to the
exact boundaries that we are told are the only solution to the
conflict. The world of June 3, 1967, was one in which not a single Jew
lived in Judea and Samaria, nor in the eastern part of Jerusalem. No
Jew prayed at the Western Wall, or could even visit any Jewish historic
or religious site in the West Bank.
The war's anniversary ought to bring to mind the fact that the issue
then is largely the same as it is today. There is not a shekel's worth
of difference between the rhetoric and the goals of Hamas, Al Qaeda, or
that of the leadership of Iran and that of the pre-'67 war Arab and
Muslim world.
Compare the Jews of Sederot, who are subjected to missile attacks from
Gaza today, and those slain by cross-border terror attacks that
emanated from the same area prior to June 1967. The only difference is
that prior to the Oslo peace accords and Israel's complete withdrawal
from the territory in August 2005, we could still harbor illusions
about the willingness of the Palestinians to embrace a chance for peace.
LONGING FOR DEFEAT?
All the introspection about 1967 ought to lead us to wonder why so many
of us here are so uncomfortable with an Israel that is identified with
power rather than weakness. Was the Israel that so many believed to be
fated for imminent extinction in May 1967 more virtuous than the
contemporary Jewish state? No. The "occupation" that fuels Arab and
Muslim fury refers to every inch of the country. Israel's victory did
not create Islamist extremism, it's just another excuse for a hatred
that already existed.
Conversely, the joy with which the Jewish world greeted the events of
June 1967 stemmed not only from being reunited with places like the
Kotel, as identification with a proud, successful Jewish people. Like
the creation of the state in 1948, the Six-Day War changed the lives of
every Jew. For centuries, Jewish identity was bound up with
homelessness and powerlessness. These victories allowed Jews to hold
their heads up higher not only here in the United States, but even in
the Soviet Union, where a movement for emigration to Israel was
launched in its aftermath.
The Israel that emerged from that war has made its share of mistakes —
though some of those errors were rooted more in a naive belief in the
possibility of peace than triumphalism. But what the war demonstrated
to the world was that the Jewish re-entry into history that Zionism
represented was not to be erased after a mere 19 years.
That is a verdict some would like still to reverse. Yet the
"occupation" so many lament was created by Arab aggression, and is
rooted in the alienable right of the Jewish people to their own country
rather than in some aberrant variant of Zionist imperialism. More
territorial compromise will come when Israel's enemies give up their
war to destroy it. Sadly, as recent events have again proved, that
moment is nowhere in sight.
Until it does, those supporters of Israel here who spend so much time
apologizing for it would do better to apply themselves to the task of
asserting the justice of Israel's right to self-defense. Success in war
has its drawbacks, but the alternative in 1967, as well as today,
remains unthinkable.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2005, Jonathan Tobin
|
