 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
May 6, 2004
/ 15 Iyar, 5764
Why Did They Do It?
By
Jonathan Tobin
Likud critics are missing the point
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
On the face of it, Israel has screwed up. Big time.
President George W. Bush went out on a limb for Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. He not only backed his plan for a unilateral withdrawal, but also reversed a decades-old American policy, and publicly endorsed Israel's position on its right to retain some of the settlements and its opposition to the Palestinian "right of return."
For this, Bush was roundly bashed by most American editorial writers and virtually every foreign leader. But the beating he took might have been considered worth it had Sharon parlayed Bush's seal of approval into a positive vote in a referendum on the Gaza plan held among members of the prime minister's Likud Party.
But instead of giving Sharon — and Bush — what they wanted, the Likudniks gave both a black eye, with a resounding 60 percent "no" vote. As a result, all those who dismissed Bush's historic move as dunderheaded diplomacy are now having a good laugh at the president's expense.
In the eyes of people like former President Jimmy Carter and others, Bush had foresworn America's supposed role as an "evenhanded" broker between Israel and the Arabs. Carter dismissed Bush as the most pro-Israel president in history, and he didn't mean it as a compliment.
The Washington Post spoke for the foreign-policy establishment when it editorialized on Tuesday that "Bush compromised the ability of the United States to serve as mediator of a final settlement. ... The result is a blow to U.S. standing in the Middle East."
It has yet to be seen whether Bush will stay the course. He rightly refused a request by King Abdullah of Jordan, still the State Department's teacher's pet, that the president rethink his position. But the king may wind up getting his own Bush letter that will differ from the one sent to Sharon.
HOW UNREPRESENTATIVE?
Bush has also allowed Secretary of State Colin Powell to sign on to a diplomatic "Quartet" statement that contradicts the American commitment to Israel. Other statements from Powell prior to the referendum helped Sharon's opponents convince some voters that Bush's word couldn't be trusted.
But why did the Likud put Bush and Sharon in this position?
First, as many have already pointed out, the 60,000 Likudniks who voted "no" in a party ballot where only a couple of hundred thousand Israelis (out of a population of more than 5 million) were eligible to vote do not necessarily represent mainstream opinion in the country.
That's true. But, to be fair, the "no" votes in the Likud referendum don't represent a smaller percentage of voters than the few Democrats in a handful of states whose votes made Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry a finalist in this year's presidential contest.
The Likud is Israel's leading party, and its members may not be a true cross-section of opinion in the Jewish state, but they aren't any less so than a similar sampling from parties such as Labor that they trounced in the last two general elections.
Sharon was foolish to hold the referendum, which was an attempt to go over the heads of his deeply divided Cabinet. He may yet be able to undo the harm with some clever maneuvering, but the Likud rebuke is a slap to Bush that was both undeserved and strategically foolish for Israel.
Yet rather than merely say that the Likud electorate was stupid, maybe we should be asking why so many Israelis were willing to put Bush and their own elected leader in such a precarious position.
The answer is plain: They don't think Israel should be asked to make concessions at a time when the Palestinians are doing everything in their power to kill as many Jews as possible.
Few Israelis other than the 7,500 who live there want to keep Gaza. But as much as I believe Sharon's position to be a reasonable one — and Bush's backing of him to be courageous — I can't entirely fault those Israelis who say that handing over parts of Gaza and northern Samaria to the terrorist organizations isn't going to advance peace. Peace isn't at hand, with the Gaza plan or without it. The only question is whether more lives will be saved or lost by the withdrawal. And no one can answer that query with absolute certainty.
The settlement movement is widely reviled abroad, and even in many sectors of Israeli society, but the main impetus behind Sharon's defeat probably isn't Jewish messianism. So long as the Palestinians consider the murder of Jews living in the territories — such as the pregnant mother and her four children mercilessly slaughtered on Sunday — to be a legitimate form of protest, they shouldn't expect much sympathy from Israel's voters.
BLAMING A COUNTRY FOR EVERYTHING
What the "no" vote represents is also a revolt against the international opinion which claims that, despite everything that has happened in the last decade, Israel's moral standing is still no better than that of the Palestinians. The fact that the Palestinians violated the Oslo accords while Israel kept its side of the bargain is considered ancient history. So, too, is the fact that Sharon's predecessor, Ehud Barak, offered the Palestinians much of what they asked for in 2000 — and was answered with a terrorist war of attrition.
In the same Post editorial blasting Bush's move as "A Poor Wager," the paper opined that Sharon's plan was as bad as Barak's peace initiative. Their reasoning was that the failure to achieve peace was, and is, the fault of Barak and Sharon, not the Palestinians who rebuffed them.
What Bush has done is to assert that the two sides were not equally to blame for the lack of peace. But the chattering classes have created a political universe where Israel is at fault for everything that happens, including the slaughter of its own people. In that context, no wonder large numbers of Israelis have been left uninterested in any unilateral gestures, even those that might strengthen Israel in the long run. The "no" vote in the referendum was created by three-plus years of Palestinian terrorism.
The key to an Israeli majority for compromise lies in the hands of the Palestinians, not Sharon's advisers. Until then, the naysayers of Likud will continue to find themselves on firm political ground.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2004, Jonathan Tobin
|
