We feel your pain; Physicians have it too no thanks to the DEA

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Everybody knows what a "symptom" is. It's an indicator of something else. Some symptoms, such as a runny nose, can indicate something as trivial as a head cold. Other symptoms point to far more debilitating or even deadly conditions.

This article is about the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) inflicting pain on both patients and doctors - and what this symptom might mean.

Way back during the so-called Progressive Era a century ago, a de facto alliance of physicians and bureaucrats undertook to regulate the possession and distribution of drugs, especially those that affected the sensation of pain. Their intentions like those of the temperance movement were humane, at least in theory. They had seen what morphine addiction had done to a generation of Civil War veterans; they'd watched too many middle-class matrons quietly wasting away on laudanum, an opium preparation. They wanted to help.

Whether they did or not help is debated to this day. But never could the most ardent Progressive do-gooder have imagined that today, anti-drug laws would be used by overzealous bureaucrats and frenetic enforcers to deny patients desperately needed treatments, or drive physicians out of medical practice, or send them to prison.

No, we're not talking here about legalizing marijuana, or about the tiny percentage of doctors who criminally abuse their prescription pads, and belong in jail. We're talking about government agents making it ever more difficult for patients in severe pain to get relief, as these government officials take unto themselves the "responsibility" of keeping patients from becoming "addicted" to drugs that allay their suffering and survive.

Publicly, the Feds make all the right noises. Asa Hutchinson, former DEA Director, speaking to a meeting of the American Pain Society on March 14, 2002, told doctors:

"...we trust your judgment. You know your patients. The DEA does not intend to play the role of doctor. Only a physician has the information and knowledge necessary to decide what is appropriate for the management of pain in a particular situation. The DEA is not here to dictate that to you. .... We never want to deny deserving patients access to drugs that relieve suffering and improve the quality of life."

But consider what the drug enforcers actually do:

Dr. Deborah Bordeaux of South Carolina was convicted under a "drug kingpin" statute carrying a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years, even though she'd worked only two months in a temporary position treating chronic pain and other ailments.
The late Dr. Benjamin Moore, worked briefly in the same clinic, pled guilty although convinced of his own innocence, and then committed suicide rather than testify against others.
Dr. Jeri Hassman of Arizona, who had the largest pain practice in Tucson, is being threatened with a 28-year prison term, apparently because a small fraction of her patients used prescriptions in unauthorized ways.

Mere anecdotes? Perhaps. But then, the plural of "anecdote" is "data." And there are many, many more examples.

Other government actions "send the same message." At a pain management conference sponsored by the Pima County Medical Society of Tucson, Arizona, speakers such as David Greenberg, MD, MPH, chief investigator for Arizona Medical Board, and Neil Irick, MD, a pain specialist from Bloomington, Indiana, told doctors to protect themselves by using surveillance cameras and urine drug screens to make sure each patient is as "clean" as he or she claims to be. Further, to make sure the patient isn't importing somebody else's clean urine, they advised doctors to frisk patients before they give the urine specimen, and then to maintain a chain of custody for the specimen, the same way police treat specimens from criminal drug suspects.

In other words, doctors should consider their patients to be criminal suspects, until proven innocent.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is now warning doctors to avoid medicines out of favor by DEA officials and to avoid prescribing more medicine than the DEA finds "usual" lest more doctors suffer similar, painful fates.

Again, we're not talking here about street drugs. We're talking about doctors prescribing legal drugs to patients who may not be able to survive, let alone function, without them. For example, some patients with cancer pain lose their appetite and can't keep food down; without adequate and appropriate treatment for the pain, these people starve to death and die quickly. But with adequate treatment, many of these same people regain their appetite and strength, and live for many years.

And as the "guilty until proven innocent" standard comes to apply to doctors as well as patients, more and more physicians begin to practice that ultimate form of "defensive medicine" - quitting their pain management practice or getting out of medicine entirely.

But the problem goes much deeper than out-of-control drug cops. The government is relentlessly forcing the American physician to become the servant of the state, as hyper-regulated care-giver and as on-call policeman, under constant threat of criminal prosecution.

As usual, we recommend you write the president, senators and representatives in Congress and tell them to stop treating doctors as criminals.

Now, given these symptoms, ask yourself . . . "Where does it hurt?"

Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Michael Arnold Glueck, M.D., is a multiple award winning writer who comments on medical- legal issues. Robert J. Cihak, M.D., is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Both JWR contributors are Harvard trained diagnostic radiologists. Comment by clicking here.

05/02/03: Medical Quarterbacking
04/25/03: CNN the "Conscience-Not Network"
04/21/03: Medical Miranda?
04/11/03: Are childhood vaccines shots in the dark?
04/09/03: The PETA Principle -- The lambshank Redemption
03/28/03: American conscience?
03/21/03: West Wimps or Wings: Treatment for Hollywood Hypocrisy
03/13/03: Worldwide schmaltz shortage looms --- all because of a featherless chicken
03/06/03: Legal metastases are killing us
02/28/03: Outside the Jury Box: Seeking Justice rather than a Lottery in Medical Liability
02/21/03: Workforce temperature rising; employer TLC in demand
02/14/03: Malpractice Insurance: They Reap What They Sue
02/12/03: Hawk, Dove or Groundhog: Diagnosis Critical List; Prognosis Uncertain
02/07/03: How about tax cuts for the "rich" and "poor"?
01/31/03: AIDS Bug Chasers
01/24/03: Libertarian moment or movement?
01/17/03: It's not just 'sue the docs' anymore
01/03/03: A pox on the critics; diagnosis sour grapes
01/03/03: If protesting is good for your health; then at least let's root for the home team
12/20/02: Obesidemic (obesity epidemic) or not?
12/20/02: Time for voluntary informed smallpox vaccinations
12/13/02: The real reason the state opposes homeschooling?
12/06/02: Conscience of a former conservative: Portrait of a political metamorphosis
11/27/02: Thanksgiving dinner hazard?
11/22/02: Time to think outside the box and inside the nucleus
11/15/02: The military should be protected from abusive environmental laws in times of war
11/11/02: Does Kyoto Treaty pose more harm than global warming?
10/31/02: Deep thoughts on Baseball, the World Series and Life: How about them Anaheim Angels?
10/23/02: "Pediatric rule" guinea pigs
10/23/02: Once the World Series ends, we need to create a Donnie Moore Day of Remembrance: Sports and mental health
10/18/02: Congress to senior patients: Do as we say not as we do for ourselves
10/11/02: Using pollution "scare labeling" to political advantage
10/04/02: The Great Asbestos Heist: Did Litigation and Junk Medical Science Helped Bring Down the World Trade Center?
09/27/02: The imminent rise of civic feminism: A far healthier national alternative in war and peace
09/20/02: A Ray A Day" to replace the daily apple?
09/13/02: Beware of celebrities hawking drugs
09/06/02: Avoid 9/11 overdose: Give blood to begin "September of Service," SOS
08/28/02: From Doubleday to strikeday: Baseball's collective anxiety attack
08/23/02: Should she or shouldn't she?: An alternative view on treating menopause with HRT
08/16/02: Cooking up defenses against germ warfare
08/02/02: Medicine, crime and canines
07/26/02: Lies, pathologic lies and the Palestinians
07/19/02: Medicare Drug Follies � as in "now you see it, now you don't"
07/12/02: Anti-Profiling: A New Medically False Belief System
07/08/02: Don't procrastinate, vaccinate!
06/28/02: The scientific advances on the safe and effective deployment of DDT are being ignored, or denied. Why?
06/21/02: Sex and the system: In seeking healthcare men are different from women
06/14/02: The FDA, drug companies and life-saving drugs: Who's the fox and who's the hen now?
06/07/02: Medical Privacy Lost: A hippo on the healthcare back!
05/24/02: To clean up America's game: A (soggy) ground rule
05/10/02: Free speech is good medicine
05/03/02: Medicine's Vietnam
04/26/02: Attack on alternative medicine could lead to alternative lawsuits
04/12/02: Insure the 'crazies'?
04/09/02: No Time for Litmus Tests: In War We Need a Surgeon General and NIH, CDC, and FDA Directors
04/02/02: The scoop on soot: A dirty rotten shame?
03/22/02: Too many beautiful minds to waste: The first annual Caduceus Movie
03/15/02: Terror and transformation: Defense essential for health & state of mind
03/08/02: Diagnosis: Delusional
03/06/02: The great matzah famine
03/01/02: Is new Hippocratic Oath hypocritical?
02/15/02: Why the recent moaning about cloning?
02/08/02: Searching for Dr. Strangelove
01/15/02: Score one for the value of human life
01/04/02: Medical-legal-financial wake-up call
12/28/01: Who's afraid of a 'dirty bomb'?
12/21/01: End of medicine?
12/14/01: More heroes: Docs deserve a little credit after 9/11
11/16/01: Do we need 'Super Smallpox Saturdays'?
11/09/01: Why the post-9-11 health care debate will never be the same
11/01/01: Common sense good for our mental health
10/26/01: Your right to medical privacy --- even in terror time
10/12/01: Failed immigration policy ultimately bad for nation's mental health: Enemy within leads to epidemic of jumpy nerves
09/28/01: Can legal leopards change their spots: A treat instead of a trick
09/21/01: Civil defense again a civic duty
08/30/01: Shut down this government CAFE
08/23/01: School Bells or Jail Cells?
08/15/01: Time to take coaches to the woodshed
08/10/01: Blood, Guts & Glory: The Stem of the Stem Cell controversy