 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
April 23, 2008
/ 18 Nissan 5768
Making Sense of the ‘J Street’ Jive
By
Jonathan Tobin
New D.C. Jewish lobby seeks to undermine AIPAC in the name of mythical Arab moderates
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
It is not exactly a secret that in some quarters, the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee, better known as AIPAC, is seen as a vast,
powerful organization that has run roughshod over Capitol Hill and
imposed a pro-Israel slant on American foreign policy.
For those who have been asleep for the past couple of years, that is,
more or less, the thesis of John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, authors
of "The Israel Lobby," a book that has propelled those two otherwise
respected but obscure scholars into stars of the left-wing academic
speechmaking circuit.
This was the same line taken by former president Jimmy Carter in his
2006 "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid," which similarly libeled American
Jews and sought to delegitimize American supporters of the Jewish state.
Of course, both books are bunk.
The reason why the overwhelming majority of Americans back Israel has
little to do with AIPAC's lobbying prowess and everything to do with
the fact that most of us rightly see Israel as a democratic ally with
Western values, assailed by Arab and Muslim authoritarians and
Islamists. Oh, yes, then there is the small detail that a huge slice of
the U.S. electorate believe that their Christian faith makes it
imperative that they support Israel.
AN EFFECTIVE LOBBY
But that said, AIPAC has done a pretty good job rallying this natural
goodwill for Israel, and turning it into votes for measures that buck
up the alliance between Jerusalem and Washington.
Indeed, it has been doing this job for so long that it's getting hard
for a lot of us to remember that once upon a time, support for Zionism
was once very effectively countered by State Department Arabists and
oil-industry advocates.
And despite the fact that anti-Israel members of Congress are a
minority these days, foes of the Jewish state still make themselves
heard with ease in Washington and in the academy. They are, after all,
funded by a source that actually dwarfs AIPAC's American Jewish donors:
the Saudis and the Persian Gulf states.
But not all of AIPAC's critics are avowed anti-Zionists. For some
American Jews, AIPAC's success in mobilizing a broad bipartisan
coalition in favor of the alliance is somehow troubling. For
self-proclaimed "doves," AIPAC has become part of what they see as an
American-Jewish-made obstacle to peace. Some on the Jewish left are now
seeking to, in the words of a Jewish Telegraphic Agency report on the
subject, "play tough" with AIPAC via the creation of an organization
calling itself J Street in a takeoff on the fact that many D.C.
lobbyists work on the city's K Street.
J Street's appeal seems to center on the notion that members of
Congress are under the misapprehension that the alleged right-wing
slant of AIPAC is not representative of the views of most American Jews
who are, according to J Street's backers, doves like them.
They want to help promote American support for Palestinian and other
Arab "moderates." J Street's goal will be to puncture AIPAC's aura of
power and make it clear that the "pro-peace" lobby is the true voice of
American Jewry, as well as being more genuinely supportive of the
interests of Israel.
It is a free country, and J Street has every right to use the reported
$1.5 million raised on its behalf to say anything it wants to Congress
or anyone else. But the group's premise is flawed in several respects.
The first is the notion that Jewish criticisms of Israel are being
suppressed in this country.
In promoting these "dovish" views, they are, after all, hardly alone.
Other groups, including the influential Israel Policy Forum, already
provide a forum for the "peace now" crowd. Nor are such views absent
from the American media, which are flooded with abuse of Israel and
where defenses of Jewish rights in the conflict, as well as the state's
measures of self-defense, are often lacking.
Moreover, the notion that AIPAC is a creature of Israel's Likudnik
right is another falsehood.
AIPAC, itself the creation of a broad coalition of groups, has always
reflexively supported the point of view of all Israeli governments,
including the ones that promoted the Oslo peace accords and the
unilateral withdrawal from Gaza. Throughout the entire period of
Oslo-inspired peace euphoria, as well as during the leadup to the
pullout from Gaza, AIPAC's policies were a source of great frustration
to right-wingers, who, at times, themselves sought to outflank the
lobby.
More importantly, the notion underlying the whole initiative is based
on belief in a creature as mythical as the unicorn: Palestinian
peaceniks.
The current situation, in which the Islamists of Hamas clearly command
the support of the majority of Palestinians, while being physically in
control of Gaza, is deplorable. But it is a fact.
Diplomatic charlatans, such as the aforementioned Jimmy Carter, may
tirelessly promote, as he did just this week, the idea that Hamas wants
peace but no one — not even the Palestinians — believe him. Its goal is
not a secret: the destruction of the Jewish state and not merely its
withdrawal behind the 1949 armistice lines.
On the other hand, the Palestinian Authority — the body that Israel's
government and the Bush administration claim is "moderate" — is
powerless to make peace, even if they really want it. But given the
role that the P.A., and its Fatah and Al Aksa Martyrs Brigade
components, plays in fomenting hate and terror against Jews and Israel,
faith in their good intentions requires a substantial suspension of
disbelief.
AN OUTDATED CONCEPT
More to the point, in the aftermath of the crackup of Oslo, the second
intifada and the rise of Hamas, the whole idea of American Jewry, as
well as Israeli voters being split along "right" and "left" fault lines
about peace, is an outdated concept.
The vast majority of both Israelis and American Jews no longer support
the idea of holding onto most of the territories. But the concept that
more Israeli concessions (on top of the enormous sacrifices in terms of
land and blood already made by Israel in the name of peace) will
transform the Palestinians into peace partners is discredited. The
majority of Israelis would gladly make a land for peace deal. But they
now understand that there is currently no one to make it with.
That's a tough pill for many of us to swallow. For those who prefer to
focus on false notions of Israeli intransigence, rather than the actual
record of the last 15 years of failed attempts at peacemaking, J Street
will provide an outlet.
In the coming months, J Street will probably use whatever influence it
can muster to undermine the pro-Israel community's continued attempts
to ask Congress and the White House to hold both Hamas and Fatah
accountable for their support of terror and hate education for
Palestinian kids. They'll probably fail. But that they will do so in
the name of peace won't make their position any less foolish, as well
as irresponsible.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2007, Jonathan Tobin
|
