 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
April 5, 2005
/ 25 Adar II, 5765
Sharon's folly
By
Daniel Pipes
The Israeli prime minister not only betrayed those who voted for him but his legally dubious move will have many malign consequences
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
With the passage last week of a budget bill in Israel, the government of Ariel Sharon appears to be ready to remove over
8,000 Israelis living in Gaza, if necessary with force.
In addition to the legal dubiousness of this step and its historical unprecedented nature (challenge to the reader: name another
democracy that has forcibly removed thousands its own citizens from their lawful homes), the planned withdrawal of all Israeli
installations from Gaza amounts to an act of monumental political folly.
It also comes as an astounding surprise. After the Oslo round of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations (1993-2001) ended in disaster,
many Israelis looked back on Oslo's faulty assumptions, their own naïveté, and resolved not to repeat that bitter experience.
Israelis awoke from the delusion that giving the Palestinians land, money, and arms in return for airy-fairy and fraudulent
promises would lessen Palestinian hostility. They realized that, to the contrary, this imbalance enhanced Palestinian rejection of
the very existence of the Jewish state.
By early 2001, a riven Israeli electorate had largely re-unified. When Ariel Sharon became prime minister in February 2001, a
wiser leadership had apparently taken over in Jerusalem, one that recognized the need for Israel to return to toughness and
deterrence.
These optimistic expectations were indeed fulfilled for nearly three years, 2001-03. Sharon engaged in a quite masterful double
diplomacy in which he simultaneously showed a cheery face (toward the American government and his leftist coalition partners)
and a tough one (toward his Likud constituents and the Palestinians). The purposefulness and underlying consistency of his
premiership from the start impressed many observers, including this one; I assessed Sharon's record to be "a virtuoso
performance of quietly tough actions mixed with voluble concessions."
Sharon decisively won re-election in January 2003 over Amram Mitzna, a Labor opponent who advocated an Oslo-style unilateral retreat from Gaza. Sharon unambiguously condemned this idea back then: "A unilateral withdrawal is not a recipe for
peace. It is a recipe for war." After winning the election, his talks in February 2003 about forming a coalition government with
Mitzna failed because Sharon so heavily emphasized the "strategic importance" of Israelis living in Gaza.
By December 2003, however, Sharon himself endorsed Mitzna's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza. While he did so in a spirit
very different from the prior Oslo diplomacy, his decision has the same two main characteristics.
First, because the decision to retreat from Gaza took place in the context of heightened violence against Israelis, it vindicates
those Palestinian voices arguing for terrorism. The Gaza retreat is, in plain words, a military defeat. It follows on the
ignominious Israeli abandonment of its positions and its allies in Lebanon in May 2000, a move which much eroded Arab
respect for Israeli strength, with dire consequences. The Gaza withdrawal will almost certainly increase Palestinian reliance on
terrorism.
Second, the retreat is heating up the political climate within Israel, bringing back the dangerous mood of exaggeration, incivility,
hostility, and even lawlessness. The prospect of thousands of Israelis evicted from their homes under threat of force is rudely
interrupting what had been a trend toward a more healthy atmosphere during the relative calm of 2001-03.
Sharon's plans at least have a disillusioned quality to them, sparing Israel the wooly notions of a "new Middle East" that so
harmed the country a decade ago. But in another way, Sharon's plans are worse than Oslo; at least that disaster was carried
out by the clueless Left. A Right — led by Ariel Sharon — valiantly and staunchly opposed it. This time, it is the Right's hero
who, allied with the far-Left, is himself leading the charge, reducing the opposition to marginality.
There are many theories for what reversed Sharon's views on the matter of a unilateral Gaza withdrawal in the ten months
between February and December 2003 — I have my own ideas about the hubris of elected Israeli prime ministers — but
whatever the reason, its consequences are clear.
Sharon betrayed the voters who supported him, wounding Israeli democracy. He divided Israeli society in ways that may
poison the body politic for decades hence. He aborted his own successful policies vis-à-vis the Palestinians. He delivered
Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim rejectionists their greatest boost ever. And he failed his American ally by delivering a major
victory to the forces of terrorism.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading."
Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment by clicking here.
JWR contributor Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum.
© 2005, Daniel Pipes
|
