
 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
April 23, 2004
/ 2 Iyar, 5764
A historic shift
By
Jonathan Tobin
America's unwillingness to disabuse the Palestinians of their illusions helped fuel the conflict for far too long.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
We don't know who will be sworn in as president of the United States in
January. Nor can we be sure whether the present occupant of the prime minister's
chair in Israel will still be in office by that time.
But we do know that the actions of the current White House tenant has just
done something that will alter a diplomatic equation no matter who's in power in
2005.
By stating last week that the United States does not support the notion that
Middle East peace is predicated on a complete Israeli withdrawal from all
territory it won in the 1967 Six-Day War, and by spelling out that the United
States rejects any Palestinian refugee "right of return," Bush has substantially
altered the starting point for any future talks.
While Palestinians lament that what Bush has done is the equivalent of the
1917 Balfour Declaration which set in motion Britain's commitment to creating
a Jewish national homeland in Palestine are hyperbole, they're not
completely crazy. Bush has thoroughly debunked the idea, nourished for decades by
muddle-headed American policies, that the United States would eventually deliver
all of the territories, including Jerusalem, to the Palestinians on a silver
platter.
PAYING THE PIPER
No wonder they're screaming bloody murder! For the first time in decades, an
American president stood up ignoring the advice of the State Department and
our European "allies" and stated the obvious.
In a precedent-setting move, an American president made it clear to the
Palestinians, and their cheerleaders in Europe and the international press, that
their war against Israel will not produce a diplomatic solution to reverse the
outcome of the 1967 war. Nor will it yield a treaty that will allow Palestinian
Arabs to pursue the destruction of Israel by "peaceful" means, such as
swamping it with millions who claim descent from those who fled the country during
the course of a war they started to destroy the newborn state in 1948.
Israel paid a price for Bush's move. It came only after Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon pledged to completely evacuate Gaza and uproot 7,500 Israelis from
their homes. He also promised to similarly displace those who lived in four
settlements in northern Samaria. In exchange for this, Israel will get not a thing
from the Palestinians, whose leadership remains just as committed to Israel's
destruction as before.
Those Israeli leaders who pursued the failed Oslo accords at least got
Palestinian promises of peace and an end to terror, albeit promises that were
blatantly insincere and never kept.
Why is Sharon's "deal" better for Israel?
Simply because, contrary to the Oslo gambit, Sharon is acting to carry out
the wishes of the overwhelming majority of the Israeli people, who no longer
wish to have anything to do with Gaza and think they will be better off without
it, settlements notwithstanding.
Sharon's idea of a peace is far more realistic. Since he knows that the Arab
war on Israel is ongoing, and that there's little, if any, hope of ending it
via diplomacy, he seeks to unilaterally draw a border Israel can better defend,
militarily and politically.
He hopes that giving up Gaza will consolidate Israel's hold on Jerusalem and
on parts of the West Bank that no Israeli government ought to consider
leaving, including areas where some 230,000 Jews reside.
Is this realistic? Bush's answer is "yes."
While Bush's move will probably win Sharon the support of the majority of his
Likud Party in a referendum on the Gaza withdrawal, it isn't certain what
Bush will get in return.
SLAMMED HERE, SLAMMED THERE
Instead of being lauded as a reaffirmation of America's alliance with Israel
and its support for the Jewish state's continued existence, Bush has been
widely slammed abroad and on the editorial pages of most American newspapers.
Opponents, such as The Philadelphia Inquirer's cartoonist Tony Auth, accuse
him of being Sharon's handpuppet. The Boston Globe's Thomas Oliphant said he
was breaking faith with America's role as "honest broker" of the conflict. The
New York Times lamented in an editorial that "Mr. Bush's drastic and
unfortunate policy reversal" was essentially "supporting Israel's right to impose a
settlement of its choice on the Palestinians."
What's really bothering Bush's critics? Did they think Israel will accept a
"right of return" that would, in the end, destroy itself? Of course not. And
even most Bush-bashers acknowledged that an Israeli surrender of all of the
settlements was a nonstarter.
Part of this animus can be put down to partisanship. It is also driven by
hostility to Sharon and other Israelis who have rejected the folly of Oslo. But
the critics' real mistake? They fail to see that it was America's
unwillingness to disabuse the Palestinians of their illusions that has helped fuel the
conflict for so many years.
Why should Yasser Arafat or any other possible Palestinian leader agree to a
peace agreement that would give him most of the West Bank and all of Gaza if
he thinks that someday an American president will actually listen to the
braying chorus of Israel-haters at the United Nations and impose a suicidal accord
on Israel?
What Bush has done is to reverse the momentum in that direction that former
President Bill Clinton, whose tireless efforts to force concessions on Israel
in the name of an ever-elusive Nobel Peace Prize-winning treaty, did so much to
encourage.
If there is ever to be a real peace between Israel and the Palestinians and
Sharon is right to doubt that any such thing will happen in the foreseeable
future Bush has shown the Palestinians that extremist demands are off the
table. Bush's own war on Islamic terror has apparently given him enough insight
to realize that Israel ought not to buckle under pressure the United States
will not tolerate.
Some Israeli critics of Sharon, who see the Gaza withdrawal as encouraging
Palestinian attacks, have a point. But they are wrong to parse the president's
words for signs that America doesn't mean what it says. Bush clearly means what
he says on this issue, and is getting a beating from Israel's foes for his
troubles.
By staking out a position of support for Israel in this manner, he has also
managed to maneuver his Democratic opponent, Sen. John Kerry, into endorsing
the move.
A President Kerry could reverse Bush's stand, but why would he? Kerry would
pay a high political price for undoing Bush's policy shift absent a genuine
change in the Palestinians, something no rational observer ought to bet on.
Bush's stance won't end the conflict. But it does give Israel some breathing
room, which will enable it to better continue its defensive war against
threats to its existence. This is no Balfour Declaration, but it is something that,
notwithstanding his other achievements, merits him an honored place in
history, no matter what happens in November.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here. In June, Mr. Tobin won first places honors in the American
Jewish Press Association's Louis Rapaport Award for Excellence in Commentary as
well as the Philadelphia Press Association's Media Award for top weekly
columnist. Both competitions were for articles written in the year 2002.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2004, Jonathan Tobin
|