Home
In this issue
July 30, 2010
David Hazony : Reason and logic offer the weakest motivation for being good; A reconsideration of the true root of evil on this earth
Caroline B. Glick: See no evil
July 29, 2010
Jori Finkel: Largest restitution claims ever filed in U.S. courts by a single family against another nation ($100 million)
The Kosher Gourmet by Noelle Carter: Light, bright-flavored passion fruit mousse
July 28, 2010
John Keilman: For today's youths, there may be a downside to high self-esteem
Glenn Garvin: Is life wasted on the living?
July 27, 2010
Thomas H. Maugh II: Israeli scientists devise way for disabled to control computers, wheelchairs by sniffing
Caroline B. Glick: The new, improved Obama
July 26, 2010
Mort Zuckerman: Prerequisites for a two-state solution
Lisa M. Krieger: Professor fired over comments on homosexuality gets $100,000
July 23, 2010
Rabbi David Aaron: Feeling Totally Alive
Caroline B. Glick: Change we must believe in
July 22, 2010
John Rosemond: Mothers who fall short --- by design
The Kosher Gourmet by Carol Mighton Haddix: The summer slump: Lazy cook's version of cobbler is simple, seasonal and sumptuous
July 21, 2010
David L. Ulin: The dance of chaos and fate
July 20, 2010
Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The Other Butterfly Effect
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Kagan's Shariah problem
July 19, 2010
Jeff Jacoby: Look who's defending states' rights
Kathleen Parker: Americans must not be cowed by Muslim objections to cartoons
David Hazony: Answering WWMD --- What Would Moses Do?
Caroline B. Glick: A war on whose terms?
July 15, 2010
John Rosemond: To tell a child 'You can be anything you want to be' is irresponsible
The Kosher Gourmet by Marialisa Calta : Ice pops for grown-ups
July 14, 2010
Rabbi Yonason Goldson : In Judaism, Second Amendment states' rights would never be up for debate
Patrick Goldstein : Dimmed star
July 13, 2010
Julian E. Barnes : U.S. military turns to TV for surveillance technology
Libby Lazewnik: Lazy Days (SHORT STORY)
July 12, 2010
The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Disloyalty or opportunity?
Gene Weingarten: Rhymin' sly man: If Shakespeare had worked the Catskills …

Jewish World Review March 16, 2010 / 1 Nissan 5770

Behind Obama's Dangerous Overreaction on Israel

By Anne Bayefsky


Printer Friendly Version

Email this article

Share and bookmark this article



http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | The Obama administration's hysterical response to Israel's announcement that it will continue to build new homes for its expanding population in disputed territory ought to evoke one response: Methinks thou doth protest too much.


Given that the United States is supposed to be committed to the parties determining ultimate legal ownership of the land in final status negotiations, what is going on?


The Palestinian Authority is the only side refusing to sit across the table from its interlocutor without preconditions. Recent reports indicate that Mamhoud Abbas and company are still inculcating the next generation of budding terrorists in the abc's of antisemitism, refusing to put Israel on the map in their authorized school books and fanning the flames of Islamic extremists at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem - all of which is incitement and a gross violation of the Roadmap. As for Hamas, the other Palestinian authority running Gaza, it is just openly dedicated to Israel's annihilation.


None of that is preventing the Obama administration from insisting that Israel negotiate with one half of the Palestinian split personality.


In fact, the words of Vice President Biden, Secretary of State Clinton, and top advisor David Axelrod in the last few days suggest, instead, that what really concerns the human rights gurus in the White House is preserving the option of apartheid Palestine. After all, the purpose of denying the ability of a Jew to build a house on land that theoretically may one day change hands, is to ensure that a Jew-free Palestinian state can come into existence unimpeded.


This strategy is not only repugnant, it is nonsensical. Making settlements the issue will only have the predictable effect of pushing the Palestinians further away from the negotiating table.


Reading between the lines, the true explanation of the hyperbole of describing the announcement of housing plans as "insulting" - to use Clinton's word - is something else entirely: Iran. Ironically, when Vice-President Biden went before the Israeli public on March 11 and told them "The United States is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, period," only politeness prevented Israelis from laughing out loud. Nobody believed him. Everyone knows that the UN is not going to deliver a Security Council resolution imposing serious sanctions on Iran in time to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon. Every time Obama officials claim they are working on sanctions, it just reinforces the conclusion that they have absolutely no intention of doing what is necessary to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran.

Letter from JWR publisher


That leaves Israel holding the bag. And Obama - along with European countries and Australia - do not want Israel to use force against Iran's nuclear facilities regardless of the mortal threat that they pose to Israel's population. The President's only way to prevent Israel from acting - without using more overt intimidation that would reveal his having put Israel's security way down on his list of priorities and risk a backlash in Congress - is to scare Israel fast with threatened isolation on a trumped-up affront like a bunch of new houses in the desert.


Exactly the same calculation occurred with the Dubai affair and Israel's alleged assassination of one murderous Hamas mastermind. If the Europeans and Australians could manufacture enough moral outrage about forged passports in the context of the demise of a genocidal killer and the Obama White House can keep the settlement issue on the front burner, Israel will find itself on the defensive - at exactly the moment it is thinking about going on the offensive.


Will members of Congress buy the President's nonsense about Israel being the stumbling block to peace between Israelis and Palestinians? Will they place more importance on houses and living than incitement and dying? Will Jews who voted overwhelmingly for Obama now perceive this President to be the most anti-Israel sitting U.S. commander-in-chief in Israel's history? Will Israelis be sufficiently intimidated by the international blowback every time they make a move to defend themselves, or to exercise their right of self-determination, that they decide not to go it alone on Iran?


We don't yet know. What we do know is that the White House's misinformation campaign should not be the deciding factor. And we also know that for the Vice President of the United States to stand before Israelis, address the greatest immediate threat to their peace and security and misrepresent the President's willingness to do what it takes to prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb - is what is really insulting.


Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Comment by clicking here.

Anne Bayefsky is a senior fellow of the Hudson Institute, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and editor of www.EYEontheUN.org.




© 2009, Anne Bayefsky