Jewish World Review Feb 11, 2014 / 11 Adar I, 5774
Women have reached society equality . . . in foul-language
By Dan K. Thomasson
JewishWorldReview.com | The recent brief dust up (let's hope it's brief) over Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland's use of the F- word as an epithet aimed at the European Union does highlight the dramatic change of culture in women in public life, including the highest ranks of the government.
While this is a scene that always has been dominated by men, more and more women are breaking through the vaunted glass ceiling to assume important roles in public and corporate affairs. In the process, however, the traditional reserve in language and attitude when women are present is slipping away. A major reason is women themselves who beginning in the 1960s became comfortable with the "good old boy" profanity laced language of the all-male board room. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
When I was a kid, the use of what we considered the ultimate pejorative, at least, was a big time social blunder that could chill a gathering quicker than finding a rat at the bottom of the punch bowl. I remember being harassed by a female high school classmate as I struggled up a hill with a basket of goodies. About half-way up, I made clear that she should go commit and impossible biological act and was instantly pounced on by every other girl present. It took some time to win forgiveness.
Even in the 1970s I recall a story related by a colleague who said he had been unexpectedly invited to an exclusive party filled with "beautiful people." When he told a blue story, there was utter silence. You know, one of those "I wish I were anywhere else" moments. Suddenly, a cool blonde, dripping in diamonds and holding one of those ornamental cigarette holders from another era, capped his embarrassment. "Profanity, young man," she said, "is the crutch of an inarticulate M…..F….." The other guests laughed heartily.
We all know what happened hippies, the "summer of love," Vietnam, and liberation of both men and women from their mother's and grandmother's Victorian restrictions all of it exacerbated by the lowering of language of the movies and cable TV. We were free to speak our minds in the most vivid terms even if it included leaning heavily without restraint on the "crutch" words that by the way everyone knew, including the girls, when we were children.
The Vietnam protesters, including shockingly some female members of dedicated religious groups, used the F-bomb unsparingly and that permissibility drifted over to politics. Women generally in that category so far have resisted the use of profanity in public.
Do you remember the Nixon "locker room" language heard on the Watergate tapes?
What many women say in private is another matter often even in banter with men. But nothing escapes attention for long and thus Victoria Nuland's comment in private to the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine quickly became viral.
No one knows that better than Hillary Clinton, whose initial days as first lady produced a series of tales about not only her free use of barnyard language in abusive fashion to underlings including those who were assigned to protect the president and his family has been well documented. Arkansas voters apparently had been quite aware of her salty language. In one case after arriving in Washington, her salty upbraiding of those on the protective detail forced the then director of the Secret Service to launch a complaint with the president. The official was appointed to head another Treasury Department agency.
Will voters consider this penchant for the invective serious enough not to support Clinton if she runs for the presidency in 2016? They probably will not. Her qualifications as a candidate are unmistakable. Her reputation for not being an easy boss might not hurt either. Some of the best presidents have been difficult masters.
On the other hand there is a body of the electorate that finds this language and treatment of subordinate abhorrent and will at some time use it against her. One would hope that all this experience in the fish bowl has taught her something. Watching her testify before Congress in the Benghazi matter on whether the death of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and his aides was caused by a protest or a premeditated act of terrorism, she was about to punctuate her "what does it matter now" comment with some not so quaint expressions. She thought better of it.
Is this freedom of expression becoming? Not really. But it is a fact of the new culture.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment by clicking here.
• 02/05/14: Job No. 1 for Obama --- compromise
• 12/27/13: Fixing our schools
• 12/17/13: Geek babies? Say it ain't so
• 12/10/13: Bank profits rise as taxpayers subsidize employees
• 11/22/13: The myth vs. reality of President Kennedy
• 11/04/13: How could NSA spying surprise Obama?
• 10/01/13: Remember Valerie Plame and her hubby? She -- and her publisher -- hope you do
• 09/10/13: Public schools need lessons in effective education
• 08/21/13: NNCAA reforms can't come too soon
• 08/09/13: Military justice system failing in Fort Hood case
• 08/02/13: Bradley Manning's case offers cautionary tale
• 07/30/13: Disciplining students requires perspective
• 07/23/13: Not quite your great-great-grandfather's log cabin
• 07/12/13: Courting diversity in college enrollment
• 06/24/13: Post-arrest DNA collection is justified
• 06/18/13: Tax reform may have effective Dynamic Duo
• 06/14/13: Stop outsourcing government secrets
• 06/10/13: IRS couldn't survive one of its own audits
• 05/31/13: Higher ed gaining more support from states
• 05/24/13: Does Obama have Plausible Deniability?
• 05/20/13: Google Glass is progress at a cost
• 03/25/13: NCAA's March Madness still scores points
• 02/27/13: School safety radicals make things considerably worse
• 02/21/13: Wrestling needs a firm hold on Olympics
• 02/18/13: Obama may be able to do little about gun violence
• 12/17/12: When is a majority not a majority?
• 12/12/12: Government snooping's historical precedent
• 11/13/12: Petraeus learns a lesson the hard way
• 10/26/12: High court must settle affirmative action
• 10/16/12: Report confirms SATs flawed indicator
• 08/20/12: All the news fit to tweet?
• 07/27/12: Economic disillusionment marks young voters' views
• 07/20/12: Will Postal Service follow Pony Express route?
• 07/13/12: Paterno's statue should be covered up
• 07/10/12: 8.2 jobless rate endangers Obama's job
• 07/03/12: It's still the economy, stupid
• 06/19/12: Mitt Romney's chances look better
• 06/08/12: Pakistan not an ally worthy of the name
• 06/05/12: Americans have a right to be bloated
• 06/01/12: Quota system would dilute school's quality
• 05/27/12: Even now, Memorial Day means summer camp
• 05/18/12: Is there a public right to know too much?
• 05/09/12: American exceptionalism --- exceptional generosity
• 05/04/12: The Edwards trial is a sorry affair
• 05/02/12: Common sense needs to be taught . . . to school administrators
• 04/30/12: We must deal with college student debt rate
• 04/10/12: At least Ryan has a deficit-cutting plan
• 04/05/12: Celebrate one-year rent-a-teams?
• 03/12/12: A kinder, gentler day when fists settled disputes
• 03/05/12: Do conservatives want a victory or a statement?
• 02/27/12: Hillary vs. Jeb?
• 02/17/12: Why wait for the until GOP nominating convention?
• 02/17/12: Prez is not a god, just a cause of O.G. D.: Obama Governmental Dysfunction
• 02/13/12: Minor tardiness doesn't warrant court action
• 02/08/12: College rankings aren't always reliable
• 02/01/12: Millionaire Fans Watching Millionaire Players
• 01/30/12: Kiriakou case may plug leaks, stifle democracy
• 01/09/12: Feds need to find if Brit hackers targeted 9/11 families
• 12/23/11: NIH flu-strain decision endangers us all
• 12/09/11: U.S. Postal Service may be beyond saving
• 11/30/11: Do-gooder gets deserved earful
• 11/24/11: Lawmakers should pledge to think on their own
• 11/22/11: Iowa: Vital to GOP now, irrelevant later
• 11/16/11: Pentagon's senior mentor service takes hit
• 11/14/11: With Congress, expect more intransigence
• 11/08/11: Paterno's illustrious career faces tarnished end
• 10/31/11: The FBI is burned by its Boston informants
• 10/18//11: President Inexperienced again picked style and enthusiasm over caution. He must pay
• 10/10/11: Prosecutors routinely abuse plea bargaining
• 10/04/11: In Christie,shades of William Howard Taft
• 09/27/11: One word for Obama's prospects --- bleak
• 09/26/11: Obama quickly running out of time
• 09/23/11: Big-time college football is now all about the money
• 09/22/11: A trip to the dentist cleans out your wallet
• 09/06/11: College rankings a useless exercise
• 08/31/11: Thankful a mother isn't alive to see this hungry mess
• 08/30/11: Supercommittee should meet in secret
• 08/22/11: Is college still worth it? Some majors are
• 08/15/11: Pray for miracle from debt committee
• 08/09/11: S&P mixes credit ratings with politics
• 08/08/11: Politics again takes precedence over common sense
• 08/04/11: In modern society, a distinct pattern of senselessness
• 07/29/11: A debt solution: Throw the rascals out, all of them
• 07/21/11: Campaign finance reform --- you're kidding, right!?
• 07/08/11: Casey Anthony jury did its job
• 07/05/11: Nailing a prominent figure or institution should come at a heavy risk and an even greater price if proven a hoax
© 2011, SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE