Home
In this issue
April 9, 2014

Jonathan Tobin: Why Did Kerry Lie About Israeli Blame?

Samuel G. Freedman: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Jessica Ivins: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Kim Giles: Asking for help is not weakness

Kathy Kristof and Barbara Hoch Marcus: 7 Great Growth Israeli Stocks

Matthew Mientka: How Beans, Peas, And Chickpeas Cleanse Bad Cholesterol and Lowers Risk of Heart Disease

Sabrina Bachai: 5 At-Home Treatments For Headaches

The Kosher Gourmet by Daniel Neman Have yourself a matzo ball: The secrets bubby never told you and recipes she could have never imagined

April 8, 2014

Lori Nawyn: At Your Wit's End and Back: Finding Peace

Susan B. Garland and Rachel L. Sheedy: Strategies Married Couples Can Use to Boost Benefits

David Muhlbaum: Smart Tax Deductions Non-Itemizers Can Claim

Jill Weisenberger, M.S., R.D.N., C.D.E : Before You Lose Your Mental Edge

Dana Dovey: Coffee Drinkers Rejoice! Your Cup Of Joe Can Prevent Death From Liver Disease

Chris Weller: Electric 'Thinking Cap' Puts Your Brain Power Into High Gear

The Kosher Gourmet by Marlene Parrish A gift of hazelnuts keeps giving --- for a variety of nutty recipes: Entree, side, soup, dessert

April 4, 2014

Rabbi David Gutterman: The Word for Nothing Means Everything

Charles Krauthammer: Kerry's folly, Chapter 3

Amy Peterson: A life of love: How to build lasting relationships with your children

John Ericson: Older Women: Save Your Heart, Prevent Stroke Don't Drink Diet

John Ericson: Why 50 million Americans will still have spring allergies after taking meds

Cameron Huddleston: Best and Worst Buys of April 2014

Stacy Rapacon: Great Mutual Funds for Young Investors

Sarah Boesveld: Teacher keeps promise to mail thousands of former students letters written by their past selves

The Kosher Gourmet by Sharon Thompson Anyone can make a salad, you say. But can they make a great salad? (SECRETS, TESTED TECHNIQUES + 4 RECIPES, INCLUDING DRESSINGS)

April 2, 2014

Paul Greenberg: Death and joy in the spring

Dan Barry: Should South Carolina Jews be forced to maintain this chimney built by Germans serving the Nazis?

Mayra Bitsko: Save me! An alien took over my child's personality

Frank Clayton: Get happy: 20 scientifically proven happiness activities

Susan Scutti: It's Genetic! Obesity and the 'Carb Breakdown' Gene

Lecia Bushak: Why Hand Sanitizer May Actually Harm Your Health

Stacy Rapacon: Great Funds You Can Own for $500 or Less

Cameron Huddleston: 7 Ways to Save on Home Decor

The Kosher Gourmet by Steve Petusevsky Exploring ingredients as edible-stuffed containers (TWO RECIPES + TIPS & TECHINQUES)

Jewish World Review Feb 7, 2014 / 7 Adar I, 5774

World in peril: Obama's self-fulfilling nuclear policy inching ever closer

By Caroline B. Glick






Through deed and word, the White House has made its position clear


JewishWorldReview.com | It is happening in slow motion, to be sure. But we are witnessing how a nuclear armed Iran is changing the face of the Middle East.

For years, US leaders, including President Barack Obama warned that a nuclear armed Iran would spark a regional arms race.

And this is happening.

As the Wall Street Journal's Bret Stephens noted this week, Turkey signed a nuclear cooperation agreement with Japan that includes "a provision allowing Turkey to enrich uranium and extract polonium, a potential material for nuclear weapons."

Saudi Arabia has long had a nuclear cooperation deal with Pakistan, whose nuclear weapons program the Saudis financed.

Jordan and Egypt have both raised the prospect of developing nuclear programs.

And in 2007 Israel bombed a Syrian nuclear installation built for it by North Korea and paid for by Iran.

In his article, Stephens cited a recent report by the Pentagon's Defense Science Board stating that the world is entering into "a new nuclear age" which, as we see is characterized by everyone, including non-state actors seeking to develop and proliferating nuclear capabilities.

Iran's nuclear status has opened the floodgates to this era of nuclear chaos.

Also in response to Iran's nuclear progress, Gulf states and others are treating Iran with newfound deference. Kuwait, Qatar and Oman all seem to be breaking ranks with Saudi Arabia by expressing support and indeed obedience to Iran.

Shortly after word broke in late November that the US and its partners had reached an interim nuclear deal with Iran, Iranian Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif took a victory lap in Kuwait and Oman.

In his press conference with his Kuwaiti counterpart, Zarif said, "We believe that a new era has begun in ties between Iran and regional states which should turn into a new chapter of amicable relations through efforts by all regional countries."

Zarif also visited Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq. In Beirut, he took on the role previously held by the US and France when he mediated between Hezbollah and the March 14 movement to form a new government.

The fact that Hezbollah has since reneged on its agreement to the deal doesn't mean that Iran is weaker than it thought. Hezbollah is Iran's proxy. Its refusal to join the government means that Iran is now demanding better terms than it previously accepted. Its new terms require total Hezbollah domination of the country.

As Michael Rubin reported in Commentary this week, the Iraqi Kurds, who have been US allies for decades have now accepted Iranian mediation of their leadership crisis.

All of this newfound deference towards Iran owes entirely to Iran's new nuclear status.

In Washington the Obama administration placed the full weight and prestige of the White House on its campaign to derail a widely supported bill in the Congress to install additional sanctions against Iran in six months if Iran fails to comply with its obligations as in the interim Joint Plan of Action. Over the past week, due to administration pressure, the Senate buried the sanctions bill.

Far from feeling the need to protect its agreement with the mullocracy, it appears that the administration's main goal in that campaign was to weaken and discredit AIPAC, which supported the sanctions bill.

As Lee Smith noted this week in Tablet, weakening the pro-Israel advocacy group has become one of the administration's major second term goals.


FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO INFLUENTIAL NEWSLETTER

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". HUNDREDS of columnists and cartoonists regularly appear. Sign up for the daily update. It's free. Just click here.


The reason AIPAC was the target of the administration's campaign rather than the sanctions themselves is because the sanctions regime against Iran -- painstakingly cobbled together for over a decade -- disintegrated last November. When word of the interim deal got out, the stampede of European businessmen to Tehran began.

This week's delegation of a hundred French businessmen to Iran in search of deals that could bring as much as $20 billion into the country was just the latest demonstration that the entire debate about sanctions is an irrelevant sideshow.

Just as its leaders have always believed, Iran's new nuclear status is its economic salvation.

Most observers are missing Iran's rise to the stature of regional hegemon because the Iranian regime has yet to try out its new power against Israel. With Iran and its Syrian and Hezbollah proxies tied up in their jihads in Iraq and Syria, they haven't yet been able to turn their guns on Israel. But when the fighting in those theaters abates, there can be little doubt that Israel will move to the top of their target list.

And as Jonathan Schanzer pointed out in Foreign Policy this week, the Middle East is being flooded with advanced weapons that erode Israel's qualitative military edge over its adversaries.

Hezbollah and Hamas have 60,000 missiles in their arsenals - three times the amount they possessed at the end of the 2006 war. And as Schanzer noted, these missiles are far more powerful and precise than the ones they fielded eight years ago. Hezbollah's Yakhont missiles can strike naval vessels in a 75 mile radius of Lebanon's coast. Hamas has advanced anti-aircraft missiles that threaten the Air Force.

As for the Air Force, its fleet of F-15s and F-16s is already a decade old.



Syria, of course has retained more than 95 percent of its chemical weapons arsenal. And its forces are more battled hardened than ever before.

Iraq, now largely an Iranian satellite, is receiving advanced drones from the US. There is no reason to trust that those drones will not be shared with Iran and Hezbollah.

In his interview last month with CNN's Fareed Zakaria, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani stated unequivocally that contrary to claims by Obama administration officials, Iran will never "under any circumstances" destroy any of its centrifuges.

Zakaria said that means the negotiations for a final nuclear deal with Iran will end in "a train wreck," since the sides' conceptions of what was agreed to "look like they are miles apart."

But Zakaria is wrong. The talks won't end in a train wreck. Indeed, they may never end at all.

Catherine Ashton, the EU' foreign policy chief said Sunday that negotiations with Iran may well go on after their six-month deadline in July.

Moreover, whether the negotiations go on forever or end at a certain point, the result won't be a train wreck. It will be Iran with a nuclear bomb or nuclear arsenal in its basement, waiting for a propitious moment to conduct a nuclear weapons test or attack.

Last spring Rouhani gave a television interview explaining how he used his position as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator in 2003 to facilitate Iran's nuclear weapons program. Rouhani boasted that they massively expanded uranium enrichment at Natanz, and constructed the nuclear reactor at Bushehr and the heavy water plant at Arak under the cover of the neogtiations.

In testimony last month before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said that Iran has already reached the breakout point where it can assemble nuclear weapons at will. In his words, Iran's "technical advancements strengthen our assessment that Iran has the scientific, technical, and industrial capacity to eventually produce nuclear weapons."

Obama and his advisors claim that the US has the intelligence capability to know if and when the Iranians move from breakout capacity to actual bomb making.

But as Stephens reported, the Defense Science Board report rejects that conclusion. According to the board, the US does not have the capability to know when a country moves from breakout capacity to an actual arsenal.

So given Rouhani's previous subterfuge, there is every reason to assume that Iran is using its current negotiations to move from breakout capacity to a nuclear arsenal.

This state of affairs has grave implications for Israel.

Today it is no longer self-evident that Israel has the capacity to effectively strike Iran's nuclear installations.

Through deed and word, the White House has made clear repeatedly that it prefers a nuclear-armed Iran to an Israeli strike to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

As it has done several times over the past six years, the Obama administration can be expected to continue to use the many means it has at its disposal to prevent Israel from launching such an attack.

Moreover, with each passing day Iran's nuclear sites become more and more difficult to attack successfully. And Iran's technological capabilities have vastly expanded over the past decade. Today Iran can replace damaged or destroyed centrifuges much faster than it could in the past.

Iran's ally North Korea has also expanded its nuclear capabilities and its arsenal. Pyongyang is ready and willing to sell Iran any nuclear components that might be destroyed in a military strike.

Finally, Iran recognizes the implications of growing European and US hostility towards the Jewish state. It knows that if Israel openly attacks Iran and sets back its nuclear weapons program, the EU and the US will punish Israel, and express sympathy with Iran, and so give the Iranians cover to rapidly rebuild any lost capabilities.

Iran's achievement of breakout capacity and seemingly unfettered path to a bomb in the basement, and its consequent rise to the position of regional hegemony is the greatest Israeli foreign policy failure since the 1993 Oslo accord with the PLO.

Our leaders on the Right failed us. They were too weak to pay the diplomatic price for attacking Iran's nuclear installations when Israel could have easily set the program back for a decade or more.

Our leaders on the Left failed us. Their messianic faith that America will protect us from Iran if we just surrender to Palestinian terrorists lulled us to sleep at the watch when we needed to be most vigilant.

Today, due to the administration's full bore assault on Israel's right to defensible borders and to our historic heartland, we have devoted ourselves to a fruitless and irrelevant discussion of how much of our land and our security we need to give up to appease the Palestinians who will never, ever be appeased.

Our leaders continue to hope that a proper mix of concessions to the PLO will convince Obama to stand by his empty pledge to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

Obama will do no such thing. Concessions to the Palestinians will weaken us militarily and politically. And they will give us no advantage over Iran. While it is important to deal with the administration' hostile insistence on unreciprocated Israeli concessions to the PLO, we cannot ignore Iran.

Iran either has a bomb already or is about to get one. And, having been abandoned by the White House, we face this threat alone.

We must now, immediately and consistently do whatever we can still do to diminish the Iranian threat we now face.



Interested in a private Judaic studies instructor — for free? Let us know by clicking here.


Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Interested in a private Judaic studies instructor — for free? Let us know by clicking here.

Comment by clicking here.

JWR contributor Caroline B. Glick is the senior Middle East Fellow at the Center for Security Policy in Washington, DC and the deputy managing editor of The Jerusalem Post, where her column appears.

© 2013, Caroline B. Glick

Quantcast