June 19, 2013
June 12, 2013
Stephanie Hanes: Little girls or little women? The Disney princess effect
Fred Weir: In tweak to US, Russia would 'consider' asylum for Snowden
June 10, 2013
The Kosher Gourmet by Anjali Prasertong: A tart filling so good it might not make it to the crust
June 5, 2013
John Rosemond: Mom, Dad: Talk More and listen less
Egypt court sentences 43 pro-democracy workers to prison
June 3, 2013
Molly Hennessy-Fiske: Military judge to consider letting Fort Hood shooting defendant represent himself
May 29, 2013
Andrew Connelly and Helene Bienvenu: The Little Synagogue that Refused to Die
May 24, 2013
Rabbi Tzvi Hersh Weinreb: When I didn't so 'humbly disagree'
May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
Jewish World Review
Feb 14, 2012/ 21 Shevat, 5772
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise
Debra J. Saunders
From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated employers to provide contraception in their employee health care benefits has felt like an argument about the barn door's being open years after the horse got out of the barn.
In 1996, San Francisco effectively forced Catholic Charities to offer domestic-partner benefits for same-sex couples (without calling them domestic-partner benefits) in order to receive city funds to care for the sick. A 1999 law made California one of 28 states that now require employers to include contraception in health care plans that cover prescriptions.
Yet the Obama administration boldly went where no state (not even California) had gone before when it announced that under the Affordable Care Act, all employers must provide birth control as part of their health insurance packages. Churches would be exempt, but Catholic hospitals, universities and charities would not.
States have legal loopholes. In California, for example, a church-affiliated institution can get around the mandate by self-insuring or not offering prescription drug coverage. The only way out of the Obamacare mandate is to move to another country. Otherwise, there's no exit.
On Friday, the White House announced an alleged compromise: Religious organizations can opt out of paying for contraceptives, but their health care insurers must provide contraceptives to the organizations' employees on their own. Because "no religious institution will have to provide these services directly" -- as President Barack Obama claimed -- the administration offers the illusion that religious organizations aren't paying for contraceptives.
As a believer in birth control and family planning, I suppose I should be thrilled. Except that President Obama just trampled on the first part of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
"The government needs to stay out of the church," argued Carol Hogan of the California Catholic Conference. "Read the Constitution. The prohibition is on the government, not on the church."
For its part, the administration keeps stretching the English language to the brink. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services frames the issue as one of "access" to "preventive health care services." "Access" no longer means being able to obtain something. "Access" now means being able to get something for free and making someone else -- even someone who objects on moral grounds -- pay for it.
Supporters claim that the mandate is no big deal because 90 percent of Catholics practice birth control in violation of church doctrine. That tells me that there never was an access problem.
But there is a "choice" problem. In a raw exercise of power, the Obama administration has decreed that religious organizations must reject their deeply held beliefs and hand out Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives -- including the morning-after pill.
Said Richard Doerflinger of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, "We used to say that if you're pro-choice, you should support conscience clauses."
Now it turns out that Americans of all religious persuasions are free to choose, as long as they choose to agree with Obama.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders' column by clicking here.
Debra J. Saunders Archives
© 2012, Creators Syndicate
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
David Ray Skinner
Ask Doctor K