 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
January 3, 2008
/ 25 Teves 5768
Can the voters think straight about the one thing we elect presidents to do?
By
Jonathan Tobin
Foreign-Policy Presidency Roulette
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Events have a way of clarifying even the muddiest political puzzles. As
Americans prepared to pick the finalists for the presidential contest,
the chaos in Pakistan served as a reminder of a simple truth about
electing our chief executive.
No matter what the candidates say about their priorities or even what
voters say they care most about, the one thing that a president can do
is to control foreign policy.
Most Democrats spent much of the past year discussing plans to deal
with health care, economic injustice and global warming, while the
Republicans danced around abortion, illegal immigration and taxes. But
for all the emphasis that's placed on domestic issues, we all know that
the president alone can do little about any of those issues.
As Bill Clinton proved, without the support of Congress, even if it is
controlled by his own party, no president (or first lady) can enact
universal health care. Similarly, as George W. Bush learned, a sane
plan for immigration reform hasn't a chance as long as Congress and
much of the public don't go along. And the Religious Right should have
noticed that having elected three pro-life presidents out of the last
four hasn't made abortion illegal.
AN UNTIMELY REMINDER
The president is merely one part of the complex machinery of government
designed by our founders. But when it comes to matters of war and
peace, the White House is not merely one of three co-equal branches of
government. That is even more to the point when one considers that we
are still in the middle of a shooting war in Iraq and Afghanistan, as
well as a worldwide fight against Islamist terror elsewhere. And it is
upon that fact of life that voters ought to be concentrating when they
choose a president.
For some candidates, the ghastly assassination of Benazir Bhutto last
week was an untimely reminder of this very point.
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee held a double-digit lead in the
crucial Iowa caucuses going into the final days of that race. Would the
fact that he doesn't know one end of Pakistan from the other convince
enough Iowans to abandon him? We'll soon find out. Either way, a
President Huckabee would certainly test the power of prayer for many
Americans.
On the other hand, there are those who — while certainly not welcoming
the prospect of Pakistan coming apart — were certainly glad of the
opportunity to remind everyone that this was the subject on which they
knew a thing or two.
Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware has never been considered to have a
chance to be the Democratic candidate, but he is a certified foreign
policy wonk. If Americans want a guy who will enter the White House
knowing who's who and what's what abroad, he is the top choice, as
anyone who has ever heard him declaim (usually interminably) can
attest, even though a lot of it often sounds like the conventional
wisdom parroted by the State Department. Indeed, I have always
suspected that Biden is running not so much because he thinks he has a
shot, but because he thinks it is only fair to give Americans one more
chance to do the right thing and elect him.
But even in the unlikely event that voters take the advice of Biden's
many admirers in the national press and catapult him into the race as a
real contender, he will labor under the burden of having too much
knowledge and be all too willing to impart it. Redacting a lifetime of
foreign-policy experience into digestible sound bytes may still be
beyond the capacity of the loquacious senator.
Nevertheless, experience is no guarantee of being a good president
during a crisis, let alone having a reasonable point of view. The
rationale for the candidacy of New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is that
the Democrat served as Clinton's U.N. ambassador and special envoy in
other trouble spots.
But as valuable as Richardson's experience may be, his positions are
not always smart. The Bhutto assassination prompted him to call for a
complete cut off of U.S. aid to Pakistan. That may have been a better
sound byte than Biden's insight, but it also made as much sense as
fellow candidate Sen. Barak Obama's idiotic call for war on that
country earlier in the year.
You needn't be a scholar of international affairs to understand that
America is presented with a host of unpalatable choices in both that
unhappy country and in the rest of the world. Electing a person who
might actually destabilize even further a nation that has nuclear
weapons is the last thing we should consider.
STRENGTH OF CHARACTER
The Pakistan tangle also should also remind us that as much as many of
us (principally the Democrats) have been urging Jews to keep the Israel
issue out of the debate, we should still ponder what support for it
means in the context of current events.
In 2007, the Bush administration succumbed to the inevitable temptation
of trying to manufacture a peace process between Israel and the
Palestinians, despite the fact that the chances that talks will lead to
anything productive or peaceful are nil.
Bush spent his first years trying to break the "realist" strategy
predicated on repeated and fruitless attempts to force Israel into
concessions for the sake of a peace that the Palestinians had no
interest in. Foolishly searching for a foreign-policy triumph that will
gain them credit in the Arab world, Bush and Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice are now having a go at repeating the folly of the
Clinton team.
Though their government is always ready to talk, Israelis paid the
consequences of similar efforts in the past in blood. Yet this is but
one example of how presidents can alter events or become the captives
of foreign-policy conceptions that they feel helpless to change.
All of which should lead us to think that among the most important
credentials the next president should have is the strength of character
to resist foolish diplomatic endeavors, even if the entire
foreign-policy establishment is telling him that this is what he — or
she — must do.
Most of all, serious voters must think hard about a would-be
president's ability to see the big picture, in which America remains
locked in a long-term war with Islamists. They should carefully gauge
which of the candidates is merely mouthing pro-forma platitudes about
backing the Jewish state, and which are likely to carry out policies
that will strengthen Israel and weaken those who wish to destroy it and
our own nation.
The person who takes the presidential oath in January 2009 will — like
it or not — be a wartime president. None of us can know for certain
which of the candidates will be the best foreign-policy chief. But
anyone who votes for any one of them on any basis but that is
sleepwalking into a minefield.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2007, Jonathan Tobin
|
